From 352cf82581d8e5ea92527da16106f2aa49199719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:04:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item ANBZ: #27252 [ Upstream commit 1ef94169db0958d6de39f9ea6e063ce887342e2d ] [TEST FAILURE WITH EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES] When running test case generic/508, the test case will fail with the new btrfs shutdown support: generic/508 - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad) Ran: generic/508 Failures: generic/508 Failed 1 of 1 tests Please note that the test case requires shutdown support, thus the test case will be skipped using the current upstream kernel, as it doesn't have shutdown ioctl support. [CAUSE] The direct cause the 0 time stamp in the log tree: leaf 30507008 items 2 free space 16057 generation 9 owner TREE_LOG leaf 30507008 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored e522548d checksum calced e522548d fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 9 transid 9 size 0 nbytes 0 block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 1 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 0.0 (1970-01-01 09:30:00) <<< But the old fs tree has all the correct time stamp: btrfs-progs v6.12 fs tree key (FS_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) leaf 30425088 items 2 free space 16061 generation 5 owner FS_TREE leaf 30425088 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored 48f6c57e checksum calced 48f6c57e fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 3 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 16384 block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 0 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) <<< The root cause is that fill_inode_item() in tree-log.c is only populating a/c/m time, not the otime (or btime in statx output). Part of the reason is that, the vfs inode only has a/c/m time, no native btime support yet. [FIX] Thankfully btrfs has its otime stored in btrfs_inode::i_otime_sec and btrfs_inode::i_otime_nsec. So what we really need is just fill the otime time stamp in fill_inode_item() of tree-log.c There is another fill_inode_item() in inode.c, which is doing the proper otime population. Fixes: 94edf4ae43a5 ("Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Chu Guangqing --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c index f9856bb0f233..c242b1b4b80d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c @@ -4255,6 +4255,9 @@ static void fill_inode_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, btrfs_set_token_timespec_nsec(&token, &item->ctime, inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec); + btrfs_set_timespec_sec(leaf, &item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_sec); + btrfs_set_timespec_nsec(leaf, &item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_nsec); + /* * We do not need to set the nbytes field, in fact during a fast fsync * its value may not even be correct, since a fast fsync does not wait -- Gitee