# article-writing

**Repository Path**: mowenqwq/article-writing

## Basic Information

- **Project Name**: article-writing
- **Description**: 中文文章/软文/观点文/自媒体长文写作经验库——读者意识、事实先行、聚焦主线、对比论证、深度优先，来自真实创作实战。Chinese article-writing experience vault distilled from real writing sessions. (bilingual README)
- **Primary Language**: Unknown
- **License**: MIT
- **Default Branch**: master
- **Homepage**: None
- **GVP Project**: No

## Statistics

- **Stars**: 0
- **Forks**: 0
- **Created**: 2026-09-07
- **Last Updated**: 2026-09-07

## Categories & Tags

**Categories**: Uncategorized

**Tags**: None

## README

# article-writing

**中文文章 / 软文 / 观点文 / 自媒体长文写作经验库——读者意识、事实先行、聚焦主线、对比论证、深度优先，全部来自真实创作实战，每条经验都是「犯错 + 解法」对子。**

**A Chinese article-writing experience vault (posts, op-eds, long-form) distilled from real writing sessions — reader-first thinking, facts before claims, main-line focus, contrast-based argumentation, depth over length. Every entry is a "mistake + fix" pair.**

[中文](#中文) | [English](#english)

---

## 中文

### 这是什么

一套从真实创作实战（含多轮打磨的深度观点文案例）中提炼的写作方法经验库，只收录两类内容：**已验证有效的做法**、**犯过的错误 + 解法**。全部脱敏。

- **核心写作原则**：读者是普通人（用词要自然，不预设懂技术）、事实先行（先查证再落笔，禁止绑定没查证的因果）、聚焦主线（跑题的料删掉）、对比论证（中外双方对照出胜负手）、深度优先（历程长了也不怕）、观点文"必胜/最强"类写法（有条件判断 + 摆反例 + 区分结构性优势与追赶型劣势）。
- **用词与风格避雷**：不硬造网感词、不用 AI 腔/翻译腔、术语默认读者不懂要给解释、同一别扭说法会全文反复潜伏（改完一处要全局再搜）、数字必须有依据。
- **文章结构模板**：开头钩子 → 主干"我方→对方→胜负手" → 反例节 → 收尾 → 附录信源清单。
- **发布前自查清单**：7 项必走（读者视角通读、全局搜别扭词、每个数字问来源、金句问"正常文章这么写吗"、核对主线、因果核对、信源清单）。
- 附子**活文档更新协议**，可随每篇写作持续扩充。

### 安装

```bash
git clone https://github.com/mowenQWQ/article-writing.git
cp article-writing/SKILL.md /path/to/your/agent/skills/article-writing/
```

适用于支持 Skill 格式的 AI 编码助手（Claude Code / CodeBuddy / OpenClaw 等），按 description 关键词自动触发。写文章或改文章前先读一遍，可避免重蹈覆辙。

---

## English

### What is this

A writing-methods vault distilled from real creation sessions (including a heavily polished long-form opinion piece). It only contains two kinds of entries: **verified practices** and **mistakes with their fixes**. Fully desensitized.

- **Core principles**: readers are ordinary people (natural wording, no assumed technical background); facts first (verify before writing, never bind an unverified cause); focus the main line (cut off-topic material); argue through contrast (show both sides before concluding); depth over length; "must-win" op-eds use conditional claims, honest counterexamples, and distinguishing structural advantages from catch-up gaps.
- **Style traps to avoid**: no invented buzzwords, no AI-speak/translation-ese, explain any jargon your reader won't know, the same awkward phrasing tends to lurk throughout a whole draft (after fixing one spot, re-scan globally), and every number must have a source.
- **Structural template**: opening hook → main body "us → them → decisive point" → counterexample section → conclusion → source list appendix.
- **Pre-publish checklist**: 7 required passes (read from a reader's view; globally search awkward phrases; ask "where did this number come from"; ask "would a normal article say this"; verify the main line; verify cause-and-effect; include the source list).
- Includes a living-document update protocol so the vault grows with every piece you write.

### Install

```bash
git clone https://github.com/mowenQWQ/article-writing.git
cp article-writing/SKILL.md /path/to/your/agent/skills/article-writing/
```

---

## License

MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).

---

## 🤖 AI 使用声明 / AI Usage Disclosure

本项目在开发与维护过程中使用了 AI 编程助手（Claude / Anthropic）辅助代码编写、文档整理与问题排查；核心决策、内容审核与最终发布由维护者完成。

This project was developed and maintained with the assistance of an AI coding assistant (Claude / Anthropic) for coding, documentation, and troubleshooting. Core decisions, content review, and final releases are made by the maintainer.