一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2024-26921
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0
CVSS V2.0分值:
BaseScore:0.0 Low
Vector:CVSS:2.0/
漏洞简述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: inet_defrag: prevent sk release while still in useip_local_out() and other functions can pass skb->sk as function argument.If the skb is a fragment and reassembly happens before such function callreturns, the sk must not be released.This affects skb fragments reassembled via netfilter or similarmodules, e.g. openvswitch or ct_act.c, when run as part of tx pipeline.Eric Dumazet made an initial analysis of this bug. Quoting Eric: Calling ip_defrag() in output path is also implying skb_orphan(), which is buggy because output path relies on sk not disappearing. A relevant old patch about the issue was : 8282f27449bf ( inet: frag: Always orphan skbs inside ip_defrag() ) [..] net/ipv4/ip_output.c depends on skb->sk being set, and probably to an inet socket, not an arbitrary one. If we orphan the packet in ipvlan, then downstream things like FQ packet scheduler will not work properly. We need to change ip_defrag() to only use skb_orphan() when really needed, ie whenever frag_list is going to be used.Eric suggested to stash sk in fragment queue and made an initial patch.However there is a problem with this:If skb is refragmented again right after, ip_do_fragment() will copyhead->sk to the new fragments, and sets up destructor to sock_wfree.IOW, we have no choice but to fix up sk_wmem accouting to reflect thefully reassembled skb, else wmem will underflow.This change moves the orphan down into the core, to last possible moment.As ip_defrag_offset is aliased with sk_buff->sk member, we must move theoffset into the FRAG_CB, else skb->sk gets clobbered.This allows to delay the orphaning long enough to learn if the skb hasto be queued or if the skb is completing the reasm queue.In the former case, things work as before, skb is orphaned. This issafe because skb gets queued/stolen and won t continue past reasm engine.In the latter case, we will steal the skb->sk reference, reattach it tothe head skb, and fix up wmem accouting when inet_frag inflates truesize.
漏洞公开时间:2024-04-18 18:15:07
漏洞创建时间:2024-04-18 19:55:35
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26921
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息:
影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 |
---|---|---|---|---|
linux | https://git.kernel.org/linus/18685451fc4e546fc0e718580d32df3c0e5c8272 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/7026b1ddb6b8d4e6ee33dc2bd06c0ca8746fa7ab | ubuntu |
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:inet: inet_defrag: prevent sk release while still in useip_local_out() and other functions can pass skb->sk as function argument.If the skb is a fragment and reassembly happens before such function callreturns, the sk must not be released.This affects skb fragments reassembled via netfilter or similarmodules, e.g. openvswitch or ct_act.c, when run as part of tx pipeline.Eric Dumazet made an initial analysis of this bug. Quoting Eric: Calling ip_defrag() in output path is also implying skb_orphan(), which is buggy because output path relies on sk not disappearing. A relevant old patch about the issue was : 8282f27449bf ( inet: frag: Always orphan skbs inside ip_defrag() ) [..] net/ipv4/ip_output.c depends on skb->sk being set, and probably to an inet socket, not an arbitrary one. If we orphan the packet in ipvlan, then downstream things like FQ packet scheduler will not work properly. We need to change ip_defrag() to only use skb_orphan() when really needed, ie whenever frag_list is going to be used.Eric suggested to stash sk in fragment queue and made an initial patch.However there is a problem with this:If skb is refragmented again right after, ip_do_fragment() will copyhead->sk to the new fragments, and sets up destructor to sock_wfree.IOW, we have no choice but to fix up sk_wmem accouting to reflect thefully reassembled skb, else wmem will underflow.This change moves the orphan down into the core, to last possible moment.As ip_defrag_offset is aliased with sk_buff->sk member, we must move theoffset into the FRAG_CB, else skb->sk gets clobbered.This allows to delay the orphaning long enough to learn if the skb hasto be queued or if the skb is completing the reasm queue.In the former case, things work as before, skb is orphaned. This issafe because skb gets queued/stolen and won t continue past reasm engine.In the latter case, we will steal the skb->sk reference, reattach it tothe head skb, and fix up wmem accouting when inet_frag inflates truesize.
openEuler评分:
7.8
Vector:CVSS:2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
@YangYingliang ,@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@jiaoff ,@AlexGuo ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@Jackie Liu ,@Zhang Yi ,@colyli ,@ThunderTown ,@htforge ,@Chiqijun ,@冷嘲啊 ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@Kefeng ,@SuperSix173 ,@WangShaoBo ,@Zheng Zucheng
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
---|---|---|---|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26921 | None | None |
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4877225313d474659ee53150ccc3d553a978727 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e09cbe017311508c21e0739e97198a8388b98981 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d0567842b78390dd9b60f00f1d8f838d540e325 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18685451fc4e546fc0e718580d32df3c0e5c8272 |
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26921 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro |
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-26921 | None | None |
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4877225313d474659ee53150ccc3d553a978727 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e09cbe017311508c21e0739e97198a8388b98981 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d0567842b78390dd9b60f00f1d8f838d540e325 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18685451fc4e546fc0e718580d32df3c0e5c8272 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-26921 | |||
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26921 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
@ci-robot 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@zhangjialin 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@zhangjialin 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
CVE-2024-26921
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
inet: inet_defrag: prevent sk release while still in use
ip_local_out() and other functions can pass skb->sk as function argument.
If the skb is a fragment and reassembly happens before such function call
returns, the sk must not be released.
This affects skb fragments reassembled via netfilter or similar
modules, e.g. openvswitch or ct_act.c, when run as part of tx pipeline.
Eric Dumazet made an initial analysis of this bug. Quoting Eric:
Calling ip_defrag() in output path is also implying skb_orphan(),
which is buggy because output path relies on sk not disappearing.
A relevant old patch about the issue was :
8282f27449bf ("inet: frag: Always orphan skbs inside ip_defrag()")
[..]
net/ipv4/ip_output.c depends on skb->sk being set, and probably to an
inet socket, not an arbitrary one.
If we orphan the packet in ipvlan, then downstream things like FQ
packet scheduler will not work properly.
We need to change ip_defrag() to only use skb_orphan() when really
needed, ie whenever frag_list is going to be used.
Eric suggested to stash sk in fragment queue and made an initial patch.
However there is a problem with this:
If skb is refragmented again right after, ip_do_fragment() will copy
head->sk to the new fragments, and sets up destructor to sock_wfree.
IOW, we have no choice but to fix up sk_wmem accouting to reflect the
fully reassembled skb, else wmem will underflow.
This change moves the orphan down into the core, to last possible moment.
As ip_defrag_offset is aliased with sk_buff->sk member, we must move the
offset into the FRAG_CB, else skb->sk gets clobbered.
This allows to delay the orphaning long enough to learn if the skb has
to be queued or if the skb is completing the reasm queue.
In the former case, things work as before, skb is orphaned. This is
safe because skb gets queued/stolen and won't continue past reasm engine.
In the latter case, we will steal the skb->sk reference, reattach it to
the head skb, and fix up wmem accouting when inet_frag inflates truesize.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
7.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
===========================================================
@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@Xie XiuQi ,@YangYingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@郭梦琪
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9HVTH:CVE-2024-26921
受影响分支: openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4/openEuler-22.03-LTS/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2/openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@Xie XiuQi ,@YangYingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@郭梦琪
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9HVTH:CVE-2024-26921
受影响分支: openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4/openEuler-22.03-LTS/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@Xie XiuQi ,@YangYingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@ci-robot
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9HVTH:CVE-2024-26921
受影响分支: openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4/openEuler-22.03-LTS/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@Xie XiuQi ,@YangYingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@郭梦琪
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9HVTH:CVE-2024-26921
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2/openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4/openEuler-22.03-LTS
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@hongrongxuan 请确认分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@zhangchangzhong 请确认分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
登录 后才可以发表评论