The updating of 'bfqg->ref' should be protected by 'bfqd->lock', however,
during code review, we found that bfq_pd_free() update 'bfqg->ref'
without holding the lock, which is problematic:
Unfortunately, 'bfqd->lock' can't be held here because 'bfqd' might already
be freed in bfq_pd_free(). Fix the problem by using atomic refcount apis.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230103084755.1256479-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk
Hi hailan94, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers: @YangYingliang , @成坚 (CHENG Jian) , @jiaoff , @zhengzengkai , @刘勇强 , @wangxiongfeng , @朱科潜 , @WangShaoBo , @lujialin , @wuxu_buque , @Xu Kuohai , @冷嘲啊 , @Lingmingqiang , @yuzenghui , @juntian , @OSSIM , @陈结松 , @whoisxxx , @koulihong , @刘恺 , @hanjun-guo , @woqidaideshi , @Chiqijun , @Kefeng , @ThunderTown , @AlexGuo , @kylin-mayukun , @Zheng Zucheng , @柳歆 , @Jackie Liu , @zhujianwei001 , @郑振鹏 , @SuperSix173 , @colyli , @Zhang Yi , @htforge , @Qiuuuuu , @Yuehaibing , @xiehaocheng , @guzitao , @CTC-Xibo.Wang , @zhanghongchen , @chen wei , @Jason Zeng , @苟浩 , @DuanqiangWen , @georgeguo , @毛泓博 , @AllenShi , @zhangjialin , @Xie XiuQi
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
Sign in to comment