Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Donate
Please sign in before you donate.
Cancel
Sign in
Scan WeChat QR to Pay
Cancel
Complete
Prompt
Switch to Alipay.
OK
Cancel
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
458
Star
1.7K
Fork
1.9K
GVP
openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1271
Pull Requests
991
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
sched/rt: Disallow writing invalid values to sched_rt_period_us
Done
#I9K4JZ
Task
chengyu
Opened this issue
2024-04-27 16:03
<!-- #请根据issue的类型在标题左侧下拉框中选择对应的选项(需求、缺陷或CVE等)--> <!-- #请根据issue相关的版本在里程碑中选择对应的节点,若是与版本无关,请选择“不关联里程碑”--> The validation of the value written to sched_rt_period_us was broken because: - the sysclt_sched_rt_period is declared as unsigned int - parsed by proc_do_intvec() - the range is asserted after the value parsed by proc_do_intvec() Because of this negative values written to the file were written into a unsigned integer that were later on interpreted as large positive integers which did passed the check: if (sysclt_sched_rt_period <= 0) return EINVAL; This commit fixes the parsing by setting explicit range for both perid_us and runtime_us into the sched_rt_sysctls table and processes the values with proc_dointvec_minmax() instead. Alternatively if we wanted to use full range of unsigned int for the period value we would have to split the proc_handler and use proc_douintvec() for it however even the Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst describes the range as 1 to INT_MAX. As far as I can tell the only problem this causes is that the sysctl file allows writing negative values which when read back may confuse userspace. There is also a LTP test being submitted for these sysctl files at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/ Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115553.3007-2-chrubis@suse.cz [ pvorel: rebased for 4.19 ] Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
<!-- #请根据issue的类型在标题左侧下拉框中选择对应的选项(需求、缺陷或CVE等)--> <!-- #请根据issue相关的版本在里程碑中选择对应的节点,若是与版本无关,请选择“不关联里程碑”--> The validation of the value written to sched_rt_period_us was broken because: - the sysclt_sched_rt_period is declared as unsigned int - parsed by proc_do_intvec() - the range is asserted after the value parsed by proc_do_intvec() Because of this negative values written to the file were written into a unsigned integer that were later on interpreted as large positive integers which did passed the check: if (sysclt_sched_rt_period <= 0) return EINVAL; This commit fixes the parsing by setting explicit range for both perid_us and runtime_us into the sched_rt_sysctls table and processes the values with proc_dointvec_minmax() instead. Alternatively if we wanted to use full range of unsigned int for the period value we would have to split the proc_handler and use proc_douintvec() for it however even the Documentation/scheduller/sched-rt-group.rst describes the range as 1 to INT_MAX. As far as I can tell the only problem this causes is that the sysctl file allows writing negative values which when read back may confuse userspace. There is also a LTP test being submitted for these sysctl files at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230901144433.2526-1-chrubis@suse.cz/ Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115553.3007-2-chrubis@suse.cz [ pvorel: rebased for 4.19 ] Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Comments (
1
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
Labels
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(2)
C
1
https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:openeuler/kernel.git
openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Comment
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register