登录
注册
开源
企业版
高校版
搜索
帮助中心
使用条款
关于我们
开源
企业版
高校版
私有云
模力方舟
AI 队友
登录
注册
代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
仓库状态说明
开源项目
>
其他开源
>
操作系统
&&
捐赠
捐赠前请先登录
取消
前往登录
扫描微信二维码支付
取消
支付完成
支付提示
将跳转至支付宝完成支付
确定
取消
Watch
不关注
关注所有动态
仅关注版本发行动态
关注但不提醒动态
456
Star
1.7K
Fork
1.9K
GVP
openEuler
/
kernel
关闭
代码
Issues
1271
Pull Requests
986
Wiki
统计
流水线
服务
质量分析
Jenkins for Gitee
腾讯云托管
腾讯云 Serverless
悬镜安全
阿里云 SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
开发画像分析
我知道了,不再自动展开
更新失败,请稍后重试!
移除标识
内容风险标识
本任务被
标识为内容中包含有代码安全 Bug 、隐私泄露等敏感信息,仓库外成员不可访问
【主线补丁回合】writeback: Fix inode->i_io_list not be protected by inode->i_lock error
已完成
#IAZJPL
任务
LiBaokun
创建于
2024-10-24 17:22
<!-- #请根据issue的类型在标题左侧下拉框中选择对应的选项(需求、缺陷或CVE等)--> <!-- #请根据issue相关的版本在里程碑中选择对应的节点,若是与版本无关,请选择“不关联里程碑”--> ``` commit 10e14073107dd0b6d97d9516a02845a8e501c2c9 Author: Jchao Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> Date: Tue May 24 08:05:40 2022 -0700 writeback: Fix inode->i_io_list not be protected by inode->i_lock error Commit b35250c0816c ("writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock") made inode->i_io_list not only protected by wb->list_lock but also inode->i_lock, but inode_io_list_move_locked() was missed. Add lock there and also update comment describing things protected by inode->i_lock. This also fixes a race where __mark_inode_dirty() could move inode under flush worker's hands and thus sync(2) could miss writing some inodes. Fixes: b35250c0816c ("writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220524150540.12552-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jchao Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index a21d8f1a56d1..05221366a16d 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head) { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); + assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); list_move(&inode->i_io_list, head); @@ -1365,9 +1366,9 @@ static int move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue, inode = wb_inode(delaying_queue->prev); if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, dirtied_before)) break; + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); list_move(&inode->i_io_list, &tmp); moved++; - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); inode->i_state |= I_SYNC_QUEUED; spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); if (sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb)) @@ -1383,7 +1384,12 @@ static int move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue, goto out; } - /* Move inodes from one superblock together */ + /* + * Although inode's i_io_list is moved from 'tmp' to 'dispatch_queue', + * we don't take inode->i_lock here because it is just a pointless overhead. + * Inode is already marked as I_SYNC_QUEUED so writeback list handling is + * fully under our control. + */ while (!list_empty(&tmp)) { sb = wb_inode(tmp.prev)->i_sb; list_for_each_prev_safe(pos, node, &tmp) { @@ -1826,8 +1832,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, * We'll have another go at writing back this inode * when we completed a full scan of b_io. */ - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); requeue_io(inode, wb); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); trace_writeback_sb_inodes_requeue(inode); continue; } @@ -2358,6 +2364,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) { struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; int dirtytime = 0; + struct bdi_writeback *wb = NULL; trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags); @@ -2409,6 +2416,17 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME; inode->i_state |= flags; + /* + * Grab inode's wb early because it requires dropping i_lock and we + * need to make sure following checks happen atomically with dirty + * list handling so that we don't move inodes under flush worker's + * hands. + */ + if (!was_dirty) { + wb = locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode); + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + } + /* * If the inode is queued for writeback by flush worker, just * update its dirty state. Once the flush worker is done with @@ -2416,7 +2434,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) * list, based upon its state. */ if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; /* * Only add valid (hashed) inodes to the superblock's @@ -2424,22 +2442,19 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) */ if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) { if (inode_unhashed(inode)) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; } if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; /* * If the inode was already on b_dirty/b_io/b_more_io, don't * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering). */ if (!was_dirty) { - struct bdi_writeback *wb; struct list_head *dirty_list; bool wakeup_bdi = false; - wb = locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode); - inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; if (dirtytime) inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies; @@ -2453,6 +2468,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) dirty_list); spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode); /* @@ -2467,6 +2483,9 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) return; } } +out_unlock: + if (wb) + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); out_unlock_inode: spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); } diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 9d9b422504d1..bd4da9c5207e 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ * Inode locking rules: * * inode->i_lock protects: - * inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget() + * inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget(), inode->i_io_list * Inode LRU list locks protect: * inode->i_sb->s_inode_lru, inode->i_lru * inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock protects: ```
<!-- #请根据issue的类型在标题左侧下拉框中选择对应的选项(需求、缺陷或CVE等)--> <!-- #请根据issue相关的版本在里程碑中选择对应的节点,若是与版本无关,请选择“不关联里程碑”--> ``` commit 10e14073107dd0b6d97d9516a02845a8e501c2c9 Author: Jchao Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> Date: Tue May 24 08:05:40 2022 -0700 writeback: Fix inode->i_io_list not be protected by inode->i_lock error Commit b35250c0816c ("writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock") made inode->i_io_list not only protected by wb->list_lock but also inode->i_lock, but inode_io_list_move_locked() was missed. Add lock there and also update comment describing things protected by inode->i_lock. This also fixes a race where __mark_inode_dirty() could move inode under flush worker's hands and thus sync(2) could miss writing some inodes. Fixes: b35250c0816c ("writeback: Protect inode->i_io_list with inode->i_lock") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220524150540.12552-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jchao Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index a21d8f1a56d1..05221366a16d 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head) { assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock); + assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock); list_move(&inode->i_io_list, head); @@ -1365,9 +1366,9 @@ static int move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue, inode = wb_inode(delaying_queue->prev); if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, dirtied_before)) break; + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); list_move(&inode->i_io_list, &tmp); moved++; - spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); inode->i_state |= I_SYNC_QUEUED; spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); if (sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb)) @@ -1383,7 +1384,12 @@ static int move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue, goto out; } - /* Move inodes from one superblock together */ + /* + * Although inode's i_io_list is moved from 'tmp' to 'dispatch_queue', + * we don't take inode->i_lock here because it is just a pointless overhead. + * Inode is already marked as I_SYNC_QUEUED so writeback list handling is + * fully under our control. + */ while (!list_empty(&tmp)) { sb = wb_inode(tmp.prev)->i_sb; list_for_each_prev_safe(pos, node, &tmp) { @@ -1826,8 +1832,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, * We'll have another go at writing back this inode * when we completed a full scan of b_io. */ - spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); requeue_io(inode, wb); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); trace_writeback_sb_inodes_requeue(inode); continue; } @@ -2358,6 +2364,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) { struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; int dirtytime = 0; + struct bdi_writeback *wb = NULL; trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags); @@ -2409,6 +2416,17 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME; inode->i_state |= flags; + /* + * Grab inode's wb early because it requires dropping i_lock and we + * need to make sure following checks happen atomically with dirty + * list handling so that we don't move inodes under flush worker's + * hands. + */ + if (!was_dirty) { + wb = locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode); + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + } + /* * If the inode is queued for writeback by flush worker, just * update its dirty state. Once the flush worker is done with @@ -2416,7 +2434,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) * list, based upon its state. */ if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC_QUEUED) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; /* * Only add valid (hashed) inodes to the superblock's @@ -2424,22 +2442,19 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) */ if (!S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) { if (inode_unhashed(inode)) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; } if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) - goto out_unlock_inode; + goto out_unlock; /* * If the inode was already on b_dirty/b_io/b_more_io, don't * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering). */ if (!was_dirty) { - struct bdi_writeback *wb; struct list_head *dirty_list; bool wakeup_bdi = false; - wb = locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode); - inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; if (dirtytime) inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies; @@ -2453,6 +2468,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) dirty_list); spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode); /* @@ -2467,6 +2483,9 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) return; } } +out_unlock: + if (wb) + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); out_unlock_inode: spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); } diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 9d9b422504d1..bd4da9c5207e 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ * Inode locking rules: * * inode->i_lock protects: - * inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget() + * inode->i_state, inode->i_hash, __iget(), inode->i_io_list * Inode LRU list locks protect: * inode->i_sb->s_inode_lru, inode->i_lru * inode->i_sb->s_inode_list_lock protects: ```
评论 (
1
)
登录
后才可以发表评论
状态
已完成
待办的
进行中
已完成
已拒绝
负责人
未设置
标签
sig/Kernel
未设置
项目
未立项任务
未立项任务
Pull Requests
未关联
未关联
关联的 Pull Requests 被合并后可能会关闭此 issue
分支
未关联
分支 (
-
)
标签 (
-
)
开始日期   -   截止日期
-
置顶选项
不置顶
置顶等级:高
置顶等级:中
置顶等级:低
优先级
不指定
严重
主要
次要
不重要
预计工期
(小时)
参与者(2)
C
1
https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:openeuler/kernel.git
openeuler
kernel
kernel
点此查找更多帮助
搜索帮助
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
评论
仓库举报
回到顶部
登录提示
该操作需登录 Gitee 帐号,请先登录后再操作。
立即登录
没有帐号,去注册