登录
注册
开源
企业版
高校版
搜索
帮助中心
使用条款
关于我们
开源
企业版
高校版
私有云
模力方舟
登录
注册
9月17日,Gitee Xtreme 极智AI重磅发布,来Gitee直播间一起探索AI时代的软件研发新模式
代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
捐赠
捐赠前请先登录
取消
前往登录
扫描微信二维码支付
取消
支付完成
支付提示
将跳转至支付宝完成支付
确定
取消
Watch
不关注
关注所有动态
仅关注版本发行动态
关注但不提醒动态
15
Star
6
Fork
64
src-openEuler
/
edk2
代码
Issues
17
Pull Requests
13
Wiki
统计
流水线
服务
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
质量分析
Jenkins for Gitee
腾讯云托管
腾讯云 Serverless
悬镜安全
阿里云 SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
我知道了,不再自动展开
更新失败,请稍后重试!
移除标识
内容风险标识
本任务被
标识为内容中包含有代码安全 Bug 、隐私泄露等敏感信息,仓库外成员不可访问
CVE-2024-5535
已完成
#IAAQOE
CVE和安全问题
majun-bot
创建于
2024-07-05 03:41
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-5535](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535) 漏洞归属组件:[edk2](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2) 漏洞归属的版本:202002,202011,202308 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:9.1 Critical Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with anempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents tobe sent to the peer.Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequencessuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issuecould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sentto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applicationsthat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list ofsupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally neverbe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur byaccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the callingapplication.The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLSapplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised andis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly morewidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list ofprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returnsthe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in theclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns thefirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlapbetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto iscalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition andreturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reportsthat there was no overlap in the lists).This function is typically called from a server side application callback forALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the listof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero inlength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should nevernormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if theSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the listsupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then theapplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application hasaccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and hasaccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_lenparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a no overlap response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then itwill be vulnerable to this problem.In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically selecta protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocolin the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comesfrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with aclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If theapplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss ofconfidentiality will occur.This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are mostlikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is notwidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making activeexploitation unlikely.The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases ofOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when theybecome available. 漏洞公开时间:2024-06-27 19:15:24 漏洞创建时间:2024-07-05 03:41:41 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | openssl-security.openssl.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/ | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-5535 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5535 | | cve_search | | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | cve_search | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | cve_search | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | cve_search | | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1 | | cve_search | | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4 | | mageia | | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0247.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5535 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-5535.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-5535 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-5535.html | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 其它 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | suse_bugzilla | | edk2 | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. openEuler评分: 9.1 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(202308):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):受影响 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(202308):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):否 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):否 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1914
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-5535](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535) 漏洞归属组件:[edk2](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2) 漏洞归属的版本:202002,202011,202308 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:9.1 Critical Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with anempty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents tobe sent to the peer.Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequencessuch as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issuecould result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sentto the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applicationsthat directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list ofsupported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally neverbe a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur byaccident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the callingapplication.The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLSapplications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised andis deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly morewidely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list ofprotocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returnsthe first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in theclient list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns thefirst item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlapbetween the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto iscalled with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition andreturns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reportsthat there was no overlap in the lists).This function is typically called from a server side application callback forALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the listof protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero inlength. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should nevernormally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if theSSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the listsupplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then theapplication will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application hasaccidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and hasaccidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_lenparameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a no overlap response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then itwill be vulnerable to this problem.In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically selecta protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocolin the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comesfrom the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with aclient_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If theapplication uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss ofconfidentiality will occur.This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are mostlikely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is notwidely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making activeexploitation unlikely.The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases ofOpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when theybecome available. 漏洞公开时间:2024-06-27 19:15:24 漏洞创建时间:2024-07-05 03:41:41 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | openssl-security.openssl.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240712-0005/ | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-5535 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227138 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5535 | | cve_search | | https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | cve_search | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | cve_search | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | cve_search | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | cve_search | | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/27/1 | | cve_search | | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/06/28/4 | | mageia | | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0247.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5535 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-5535.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-5535 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-5535.html | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://openssl.org/news/secadv/20240627.txt | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-5535 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 其它 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4ada436a1946cbb24db5ab4ca082b69c1bc10f37 | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/99fb785a5f85315b95288921a321a935ea29a51e | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/e86ac436f0bd54d4517745483e2315650fae7b2c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9947251413065a05189a63c9b7a6c1d4e224c21c | | suse_bugzilla | | | | https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/b78ec0824da857223486660177d3b1f255c65d87 | | suse_bugzilla | | edk2 | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cf6f91f6121f4db167405db2f0de410a456f260c | | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. openEuler评分: 9.1 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(202308):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):受影响 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(202308):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(202011):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):否 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):否 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1914
评论 (
11
)
登录
后才可以发表评论
状态
已完成
待办的
已挂起
进行中
已完成
已拒绝
负责人
未设置
标签
CVE/FIXED
sig/Virt
未设置
项目
未立项任务
未立项任务
里程碑
未关联里程碑
未关联里程碑
Pull Requests
未关联
未关联
关联的 Pull Requests 被合并后可能会关闭此 issue
分支
未关联
分支 (32)
标签 (55)
master
openEuler-24.03-LTS
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4
openEuler-25.09
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3
openEuler-25.03
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1
sync-pr258-master-to-openEuler-24.09
sync-pr257-openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-to-openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1
sync-pr257-openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-to-openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
openEuler-24.09
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-22.03-LTS
openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1
openEuler-24.03-LTS-Loongarch
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP3
openEuler-23.09
openEuler-23.03
openEuler-22.09
openEuler-20.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-20.03-LTS
openEuler-21.03
openEuler-20.09
openEuler-21.09
openEuler1.0
openEuler1.0-base
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2-update-20250711
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250704
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250704
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250509
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250509
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250509
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250509
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250509
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250403
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250403
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250403
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250403
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250403
openEuler-25.03-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250321
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250321
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250228
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250228
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250228
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250228
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250228
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-release
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-before-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-before-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-before-20241025
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20241018
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-release
openEuler-24.09-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-release
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-release
openEuler-23.09-rc5
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1-release
openEuler-22.09-release
openEuler-22.09-rc5
openEuler-22.09-20220829
openEuler-22.03-LTS-20220331
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round5
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round3
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round2
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round1
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP3-release
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP2-20210624
openEuler-21.03-20210330
openEuler-20.09-20200929
openEuler-20.03-LTS-20200606
openEuler-20.03-LTS-tag
开始日期   -   截止日期
-
置顶选项
不置顶
置顶等级:高
置顶等级:中
置顶等级:低
优先级
不指定
严重
主要
次要
不重要
预计工期
(小时)
参与者(1)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/edk2.git
src-openeuler
edk2
edk2
点此查找更多帮助
搜索帮助
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
仓库举报
回到顶部
登录提示
该操作需登录 Gitee 帐号,请先登录后再操作。
立即登录
没有帐号,去注册