Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Donate
Please sign in before you donate.
Cancel
Sign in
Scan WeChat QR to Pay
Cancel
Complete
Prompt
Switch to Alipay.
OK
Cancel
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
13
Star
6
Fork
69
src-openEuler
/
edk2
Closed
Code
Issues
20
Pull Requests
9
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2024-12797
Done
#IBLWSS
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2025-02-13 00:35
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-12797](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797) 漏洞归属组件:[edk2](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2) 漏洞归属的版本:202002,202011,202308 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:6.3 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 漏洞简述: Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate aserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, becausehandshakes don t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification modeis set.Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may bevulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is notdetected by clients.RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issueonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and theserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificatechain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake tofail when the server s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that rawpublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and thosethat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue wasintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. 漏洞公开时间:2025-02-12 00:15:38 漏洞创建时间:2025-02-13 00:35:35 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3 | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4 | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0001/ | | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1330 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1487 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1925 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-12797 | | oracle | | https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2025.html | | anolis | | https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2024-12797 | | python-cryptography | | https://github.com//pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12797 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-12797.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-12797 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-12797.html | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | alpine | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | alpine | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | alpine | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: 使用原始公钥的 TLS 和 DTLS 连接可能会因客户端无法检测到服务器验证失败而遭受中间人攻击。RPK 在 TLS 客户端和服务器中默认都是禁用的。此问题仅在以下情况下出现:TLS 客户端明确允许服务器使用 RPK,同时服务器也启用了发送 RPK 而非 X.509 证书链的功能。受影响的客户端是那些通过设置验证模式为 SSL_VERIFY_PEER,并依赖握手失败来判断服务器的 RPK 是否与预期公钥不匹配的客户端。启用服务器端原始公钥的客户端仍可以通过调用 SSL_get_verify_result() 来发现原始公钥验证失败。那些会调用此函数并采取相应措施的客户端不受此问题影响。该问题最初出现在 OpenSSL 3.2 版本中实现 RPK 支持时。3.4、3.3、3.2、3.1 和 3.0 版本中的 FIPS 模块不受此问题影响。OpenSSL 3.1、3.0、1.1.1 和 1.0.2 版本也不受此问题影响。OpenSSL 3.4、3.3 和 3.2 版本存在此漏洞。 openEuler评分: 6.3 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(202308):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):不受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(202308):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):否 原因说明: 1.master(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-12797](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797) 漏洞归属组件:[edk2](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2) 漏洞归属的版本:202002,202011,202308 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:6.3 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 漏洞简述: Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate aserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, becausehandshakes don t abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification modeis set.Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may bevulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is notdetected by clients.RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issueonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and theserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificatechain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake tofail when the server s RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that rawpublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and thosethat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue wasintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. 漏洞公开时间:2025-02-12 00:15:38 漏洞创建时间:2025-02-13 00:35:35 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | | openssl-security.openssl.org | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3 | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4 | | | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0001/ | | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1330 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1487 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1925 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-12797 | | oracle | | https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2025.html | | anolis | | https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2024-12797 | | python-cryptography | | https://github.com//pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12797 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-12797.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-12797 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-12797.html | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | | alpine | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4 | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | openssl-security.openssl.org | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9 | | alpine | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7 | | alpine | | | | https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699 | | alpine | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: 使用原始公钥的 TLS 和 DTLS 连接可能会因客户端无法检测到服务器验证失败而遭受中间人攻击。RPK 在 TLS 客户端和服务器中默认都是禁用的。此问题仅在以下情况下出现:TLS 客户端明确允许服务器使用 RPK,同时服务器也启用了发送 RPK 而非 X.509 证书链的功能。受影响的客户端是那些通过设置验证模式为 SSL_VERIFY_PEER,并依赖握手失败来判断服务器的 RPK 是否与预期公钥不匹配的客户端。启用服务器端原始公钥的客户端仍可以通过调用 SSL_get_verify_result() 来发现原始公钥验证失败。那些会调用此函数并采取相应措施的客户端不受此问题影响。该问题最初出现在 OpenSSL 3.2 版本中实现 RPK 支持时。3.4、3.3、3.2、3.1 和 3.0 版本中的 FIPS 模块不受此问题影响。OpenSSL 3.1、3.0、1.1.1 和 1.0.2 版本也不受此问题影响。OpenSSL 3.4、3.3 和 3.2 版本存在此漏洞。 openEuler评分: 6.3 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(202308):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):不受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(202308):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):否 原因说明: 1.master(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(202002):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(202011):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(202011):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(202308):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
Comments (
5
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
Chuan
Chuan-Zheng
Assignee
Collaborator
+Assign
+Mention
Labels
CVE/UNAFFECTED
sig/Virt
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Milestones
No related milestones
No related milestones
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (30)
Tags (67)
master
openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-24.09
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1
openEuler-24.03-LTS
openEuler-25.09
openEuler-25.03
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-22.03-LTS
openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1
openEuler-24.03-LTS-Loongarch
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP3
openEuler-23.09
openEuler-23.03
openEuler-22.09
openEuler-20.03-LTS-Next
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP2
openEuler-20.03-LTS
openEuler-21.03
openEuler-20.09
openEuler-21.09
openEuler1.0
openEuler1.0-base
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20251024
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20251024
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20251024
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20251024
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20251024
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2-update-20251011
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20251011
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20251011
openEuler-25.09-release
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250919
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250919
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250919
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2-update-20250711
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250704
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250704
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250704
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250509
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250509
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250509
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250509
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250509
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250403
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250403
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250403
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250403
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250403
openEuler-25.03-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250321
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250321
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20250228
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-update-20250228
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20250228
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250228
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20250228
openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1-release
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-before-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-before-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-before-20241025
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-update-20241025
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-update-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20241025
openEuler-24.03-LTS-update-20241018
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4-release
openEuler-24.09-release
openEuler-24.03-LTS-release
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3-release
openEuler-23.09-rc5
openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1-release
openEuler-22.09-release
openEuler-22.09-rc5
openEuler-22.09-20220829
openEuler-22.03-LTS-20220331
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round5
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round3
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round2
openEuler-22.03-LTS-round1
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP3-release
openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP2-20210624
openEuler-21.03-20210330
openEuler-20.09-20200929
openEuler-20.03-LTS-20200606
openEuler-20.03-LTS-tag
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(1)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/edk2.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/edk2.git
src-openeuler
edk2
edk2
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Comment
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register