一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2023-52569
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:6.1.19
CVSS V3.0分值:
BaseScore:0.0 None
Vector:CVSS:3.0/
漏洞简述:
A vulnerability has been found in Linux Kernel up to 6.1.55/6.5.5 (Operating System) and classified as problematic.The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-770. The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated, in violation of the intended security policy for that actor.As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.Upgrading to version 6.1.56, 6.5.6 or 6.6 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 39c4a9522db0/d10fd53393cc/2c58c3931ede is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at git.kernel.org. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
漏洞公开时间:2024-03-02 00:00:00
漏洞创建时间:2024-03-02 22:46:15
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52569
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息:
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index itemInstead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index iteminto the delayed node s tree, we can just release all the resources wehave allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This isfine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done beforecalling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pendingsnapshots in the transaction commit path).So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it becauseit only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehowwe attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.
openEuler评分:
5.5
Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
7.master:不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master:否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
原因说明:
1.master:
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
@yangyingliang ,@gatieme ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
---|---|---|---|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52569 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d10fd53393cc5de4b9cf1a4b8f9984f0a037aa51 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39c4a9522db0072570d602e9b365119e17fb9f4f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 |
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-52569 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro |
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2023-52569 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d10fd53393cc5de4b9cf1a4b8f9984f0a037aa51 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39c4a9522db0072570d602e9b365119e17fb9f4f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2023-52569 | |||
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-52569 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
CVE-2023-52569
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item
Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item
into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we
have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is
fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before
calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending
snapshots in the transaction commit path).
So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.
This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because
it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow
we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
@CTC-XiboWang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
---|---|---|
已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index itemInstead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index iteminto the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources wehave allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This isfine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done beforecalling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pendingsnapshots in the transaction commit path).So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it becauseit only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehowwe attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. |
已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 5.5 |
已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响 |
已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
CVE-2023-52569
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item
Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item
into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we
have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is
fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before
calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending
snapshots in the transaction commit path).
So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.
This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because
it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow
we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
===========================================================
@CTC-XiboWang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
---|---|---|
已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index itemInstead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index iteminto the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources wehave allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This isfine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done beforecalling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pendingsnapshots in the transaction commit path).So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it becauseit only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehowwe attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items. |
已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 5.5 |
已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
登录 后才可以发表评论
FileDragTip