CVE-2024-26644

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-26644
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0
CVSS V2.0分值：
BaseScore：0.0 Low
Vector：CVSS：2.0/
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolumeIf the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deletedsubvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entryThis happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new rootitem as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field,which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root()therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() thenfinds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causescreate_pending_snapshot() to abort.Fix it by checking the source root s refs before attempting thesnapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion.
漏洞公开时间：2024-03-27 00:15:12
漏洞创建时间：2024-03-27 00:47:45
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26644

更多参考(点击展开)

参考来源	参考链接	来源链接
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256
suse_bugzilla	http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-26644	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-26644.mbox	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26644	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
suse_bugzilla	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271644	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222072
redhat_bugzilla	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/20240326151722.1258576-3-lee@kernel.org/T	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/linus/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a (6.8-rc2)	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26644	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6765-1	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6766-1	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26644	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-26644	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
ubuntu	https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26644	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644
debian		https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26644
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff
cve_search		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a
ubuntu	https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-26644	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)

影响的包	修复版本	修复补丁	问题引入补丁	来源
linux		https://git.kernel.org/linus/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a	https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2	ubuntu

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolumeIf the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deletedsubvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entryThis happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new rootitem as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field,which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root()therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() thenfinds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causescreate_pending_snapshot() to abort.Fix it by checking the source root s refs before attempting thesnapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1541

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@gatieme ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26644	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26644	None	None	https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-26644	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e6bca99e8d88d989a7cde4c064abea552d5219b https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bdf872bcfe629a6202ffd6641615a8ed00e8464 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0877497dc97834728e1b528ddf1e1c484292c29c https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec794a7528199e1be6d47bec03f4755aa75df256 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8680b722f0ff6d7a01ddacc1844e0d52354d6ff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-26644
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26644

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

@ci-robot 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

@openeuler-sync-bot 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

@zhang-changzhong 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

@barbo 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

@zhangjialin11 请确认分支: master,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4,openEuler-22.03-LTS,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3,openEuler-24.03-LTS,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next 受影响/不受影响.
请确认分支信息是否填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.

CVE-2024-26644

影响性分析说明：
Reserved.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0.0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

@guo-mengqi 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写:master:,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:,openEuler-22.03-LTS:,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:,openEuler-24.03-LTS:,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:

CVE-2024-26644

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: don't abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolume

If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted
subvolume, we get the following abort:

BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c
CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027
RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840
RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe
R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80
FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:

? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
? __warn+0x81/0x130
? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0
? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs]
create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs]
? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340
? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af
RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af
RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58

---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry
BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly
BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry

This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root
item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field,
which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root()
therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then
finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes
create_pending_snapshot() to abort.

Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the
snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

===========================================================

@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don't abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolumeIf the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deletedsubvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entryThis happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new rootitem as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field,which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root()therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() thenfinds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causescreate_pending_snapshot() to abort.Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting thesnapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.