一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2024-26654
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0
CVSS V2.0分值:
BaseScore:0.0 Low
Vector:CVSS:2.0/
漏洞简述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:ALSA: sh: aica: reorder cleanup operations to avoid UAF bugsThe dreamcastcard->timer could schedule the spu_dma_work and thespu_dma_work could also arm the dreamcastcard->timer.When the snd_pcm_substream is closing, the aica_channel will bedeallocated. But it could still be dereferenced in the workerthread. The reason is that del_timer() will return directlyregardless of whether the timer handler is running or not andthe worker could be rescheduled in the timer handler. As a result,the UAF bug will happen. The racy situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2)snd_aicapcm_pcm_close() | ... | run_spu_dma() //worker | mod_timer() flush_work() | del_timer() | aica_period_elapsed() //timer kfree(dreamcastcard->channel) | schedule_work() | run_spu_dma() //worker ... | dreamcastcard->channel-> //USEIn order to mitigate this bug and other possible corner cases,call mod_timer() conditionally in run_spu_dma(), then implementPCM sync_stop op to cancel both the timer and worker. The sync_stopop will be called from PCM core appropriately when needed.
漏洞公开时间:2024-04-01 17:15:51
漏洞创建时间:2024-04-01 17:44:29
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26654
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息:
影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 |
---|---|---|---|---|
linux | https://git.kernel.org/linus/051e0840ffa8ab25554d6b14b62c9ab9e4901457 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/198de43d758ca2700e2b52b49c0b189b4931466c | ubuntu |
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:ALSA: sh: aica: reorder cleanup operations to avoid UAF bugsThe dreamcastcard->timer could schedule the spu_dma_work and thespu_dma_work could also arm the dreamcastcard->timer.When the snd_pcm_substream is closing, the aica_channel will bedeallocated. But it could still be dereferenced in the workerthread. The reason is that del_timer() will return directlyregardless of whether the timer handler is running or not andthe worker could be rescheduled in the timer handler. As a result,the UAF bug will happen. The racy situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2)snd_aicapcm_pcm_close() | ... | run_spu_dma() //worker | mod_timer() flush_work() | del_timer() | aica_period_elapsed() //timer kfree(dreamcastcard->channel) | schedule_work() | run_spu_dma() //worker ... | dreamcastcard->channel-> //USEIn order to mitigate this bug and other possible corner cases,call mod_timer() conditionally in run_spu_dma(), then implementPCM sync_stop op to cancel both the timer and worker. The sync_stopop will be called from PCM core appropriately when needed.
openEuler评分:
5.5
Vector:CVSS:2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1501
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
---|---|---|---|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26654 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/051e0840ffa8ab25554d6b14b62c9ab9e4901457 |
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26654 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro |
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-26654 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/051e0840ffa8ab25554d6b14b62c9ab9e4901457 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-26654 | |||
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26654 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
CVE-2024-26654
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: sh: aica: reorder cleanup operations to avoid UAF bugs
The dreamcastcard->timer could schedule the spu_dma_work and the
spu_dma_work could also arm the dreamcastcard->timer.
When the snd_pcm_substream is closing, the aica_channel will be
deallocated. But it could still be dereferenced in the worker
thread. The reason is that del_timer() will return directly
regardless of whether the timer handler is running or not and
the worker could be rescheduled in the timer handler. As a result,
the UAF bug will happen. The racy situation is shown below:
(Thread 1) | (Thread 2)
snd_aicapcm_pcm_close() |
... | run_spu_dma() //worker
| mod_timer()
flush_work() |
del_timer() | aica_period_elapsed() //timer
kfree(dreamcastcard->channel) | schedule_work()
| run_spu_dma() //worker
... | dreamcastcard->channel-> //USE
In order to mitigate this bug and other possible corner cases,
call mod_timer() conditionally in run_spu_dma(), then implement
PCM sync_stop op to cancel both the timer and worker. The sync_stop
op will be called from PCM core appropriately when needed.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
===========================================================
登录 后才可以发表评论
FileDragTip