Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Donate
Please sign in before you donate.
Cancel
Sign in
Scan WeChat QR to Pay
Cancel
Complete
Prompt
Switch to Alipay.
OK
Cancel
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
128
Star
72
Fork
330
src-openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2024-26726
Done
#I9E2F7
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2024-04-03 23:39
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-26726](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0 CVSS V2.0分值: BaseScore:0.0 Low Vector:CVSS:2.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t drop extent_map for free space inode on write errorWhile running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panicwith generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385------------[ cut here ]------------kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in oneinstance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However onthe second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode toget the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with thefree space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlockingwith the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for therequested range.This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache outwe hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This isnormal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. Wealways expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second timethrough we end up with a bogus extent map.Since we re deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way tofix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failedrange.I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to makeit easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panicwith my error injection test. 漏洞公开时间:2024-04-03 23:15:54 漏洞创建时间:2024-04-03 23:39:56 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-26726 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-26726.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273128 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024040346-CVE-2024-26726-fed0@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273128 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade (6.8-rc5) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t drop extent_map for free space inode on write errorWhile running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panicwith generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385------------[ cut here ]------------kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in oneinstance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However onthe second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode toget the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with thefree space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlockingwith the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for therequested range.This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache outwe hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This isnormal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. Wealways expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second timethrough we end up with a bogus extent map.Since we re deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way tofix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failedrange.I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to makeit easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panicwith my error injection test. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 7.master(6.1.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响 10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 7.master(6.1.0):否 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否 10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1649
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-26726](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0 CVSS V2.0分值: BaseScore:0.0 Low Vector:CVSS:2.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t drop extent_map for free space inode on write errorWhile running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panicwith generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385------------[ cut here ]------------kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in oneinstance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However onthe second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode toget the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with thefree space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlockingwith the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for therequested range.This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache outwe hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This isnormal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. Wealways expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second timethrough we end up with a bogus extent map.Since we re deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way tofix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failedrange.I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to makeit easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panicwith my error injection test. 漏洞公开时间:2024-04-03 23:15:54 漏洞创建时间:2024-04-03 23:39:56 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-26726 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-26726.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273128 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222532 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024040346-CVE-2024-26726-fed0@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273128 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade (6.8-rc5) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02f2b95b00bf57d20320ee168b30fb7f3db8e555 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bddf18f474f166c19f91b2baf67bf7c5eda03f7 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4b7741c8302e28073bfc6dd1c2e73598e5e535e | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26726 | | ubuntu | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-26726 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26726 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: don t drop extent_map for free space inode on write errorWhile running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panicwith generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385------------[ cut here ]------------kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in oneinstance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However onthe second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode toget the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with thefree space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlockingwith the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for therequested range.This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache outwe hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This isnormal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. Wealways expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second timethrough we end up with a bogus extent map.Since we re deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way tofix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failedrange.I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to makeit easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panicwith my error injection test. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 7.master(6.1.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响 10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 7.master(6.1.0):否 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否 10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1649
Comments (
19
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
sanglipeng
sanglipeng
Assignee
Collaborator
+Assign
+Mention
Labels
CVE/FIXED
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(2)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Comment
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register