代码拉取完成，页面将自动刷新
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-26924
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V2.0分值：
BaseScore：0.0 Low
Vector：CVSS：2.0/
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live elementPablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with aback-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem( 00000000 ) timeout 100 ms ... add_elem( 0000000X ) timeout 100 ms del_elem( 0000000X ) <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem( 00005000 ) timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat.Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop arule that maps to a non-deactivated element.Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return theto-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than oneelement that share the same key.This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set alreadyholds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existingkey has timed out or is not active in the next generation.In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomesunreachable.The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) willremain reachable in the set data structure, this can result ina crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stalepointer).Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the elementthat we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step.If not, we need to continue searching.Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the removefunction must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existentelement.v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
漏洞公开时间：2024-04-25 14:15:57
漏洞创建时间：2024-05-09 02:04:34
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26924
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：
| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| linux | https://git.kernel.org/linus/3cfc9ec039af60dbd8965ae085b2c2ccdcfbe1cc | https://git.kernel.org/linus/3c4287f62044a90e73a561aa05fc46e62da173da | ubuntu |
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live elementPablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with aback-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo: add_elem( 00000000 ) timeout 100 ms ... add_elem( 0000000X ) timeout 100 ms del_elem( 0000000X ) <---------------- delete one that was just added ... add_elem( 00005000 ) timeout 100 ms 1) nft_pipapo_remove() removes element 0000000X Then, KASAN shows a splat.Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop arule that maps to a non-deactivated element.Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return theto-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than oneelement that share the same key.This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set alreadyholds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existingkey has timed out or is not active in the next generation.In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomesunreachable.The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) willremain reachable in the set data structure, this can result ina crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stalepointer).Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the elementthat we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step.If not, we need to continue searching.Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the removefunction must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existentelement.v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):不受影响
6.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容，页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容，可点击提交进行申诉，我们将尽快为您处理。
@YangYingliang ,@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@jiaoff ,@AlexGuo ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@Jackie Liu ,@Zhang Yi ,@colyli ,@ThunderTown ,@htforge ,@Chiqijun ,@冷嘲啊 ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@Kefeng ,@SuperSix173 ,@WangShaoBo ,@Zheng Zucheng
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
| 参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26924 | |||
| https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-26924 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro |
| https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-26924 | |||
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-26924 | |||
| https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-26924 |
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
CVE-2024-26924
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element
Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a
back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo:
add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms
...
add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms
del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added
...
add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms
Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a
rule that maps to a non-deactivated element.
Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the
to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.
Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.
The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one
element that share the same key.
This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already
holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing
key has timed out or is not active in the next generation.
In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.
If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes
unreachable.
The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will
remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in
a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale
pointer).
Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element
that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step.
If not, we need to continue searching.
Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove
function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent
element.
v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
===========================================================
CVE-2024-26924
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element
Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a
back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo:
add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms
...
add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms
del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added
...
add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms
Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a
rule that maps to a non-deactivated element.
Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the
to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.
Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.
The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one
element that share the same key.
This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already
holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing
key has timed out or is not active in the next generation.
In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.
If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes
unreachable.
The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will
remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in
a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale
pointer).
Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element
that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step.
If not, we need to continue searching.
Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove
function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent
element.
v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
CVE-2024-26924
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not free live element
Pablo reports a crash with large batches of elements with a
back-to-back add/remove pattern. Quoting Pablo:
add_elem("00000000") timeout 100 ms
...
add_elem("0000000X") timeout 100 ms
del_elem("0000000X") <---------------- delete one that was just added
...
add_elem("00005000") timeout 100 ms
Looking at the remove function there is a chance that we will drop a
rule that maps to a non-deactivated element.
Removal happens in two steps, first we do a lookup for key k and return the
to-be-removed element and mark it as inactive in the next generation.
Then, in a second step, the element gets removed from the set/map.
The _remove function does not work correctly if we have more than one
element that share the same key.
This can happen if we insert an element into a set when the set already
holds an element with same key, but the element mapping to the existing
key has timed out or is not active in the next generation.
In such case its possible that removal will unmap the wrong element.
If this happens, we will leak the non-deactivated element, it becomes
unreachable.
The element that got deactivated (and will be freed later) will
remain reachable in the set data structure, this can result in
a crash when such an element is retrieved during lookup (stale
pointer).
Add a check that the fully matching key does in fact map to the element
that we have marked as inactive in the deactivation step.
If not, we need to continue searching.
Add a bug/warn trap at the end of the function as well, the remove
function must not ever be called with an invisible/unreachable/non-existent
element.
v2: avoid uneeded temporary variable (Stefano)
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
@成坚 (CHENG Jian) ,@Xie XiuQi ,@YangYingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@郭梦琪
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #I9JFG2:CVE-2024-26924
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
登录 后才可以发表评论
