In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/a43e0fc5e9134a46515de2f2f8d4100b74e50de3 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/609e28bb139e53621521130f0d4aea27a725d465 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
IntheLinuxkernel,thefollowingvulnerabilityhasbeenresolved:pstore:inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn_x27;t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/a43e0fc5e9134a46515de2f2f8d4100b74e50de3 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/609e28bb139e53621521130f0d4aea27a725d465 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading amodular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn_x27;t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/a43e0fc5e9134a46515de2f2f8d4100b74e50de3 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/609e28bb139e53621521130f0d4aea27a725d465 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is neededUnloadinga modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs wouldtrigger the dput() double-drop warning: WARNING: CPU:0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned inDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn_x27;t the right approach here, andleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that cannever happen.---
