CVE-2024-35938

一、漏洞信息
 漏洞编号：[CVE-2024-35938](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35938)
 漏洞归属组件：[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel)
 漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0
 CVSS V2.0分值：
  BaseScore：0.0 Low
  Vector：CVSS：2.0/
 漏洞简述：
  In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KBCurrently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assignedwith 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channelbuffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where systemmemory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim isnot allowed.There is a fail report which is caused by it:kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfcebWorkqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fnCall Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814] device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0 device_resume+0x104/0x340 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10 async_resume+0x1d/0x30 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120 process_one_work+0x168/0x330 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is lessthan 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save somememory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failurein those scenarios.Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
 漏洞公开时间：2024-05-19 19:15:49
 漏洞创建时间：2024-05-19 20:30:42
 漏洞详情参考链接：
  https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35938
<details>
<summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary>

| 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 |
| ------- | -------- | -------- |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 |  |
| suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-35938 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-35938.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224643 |
| redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024051918-CVE-2024-35938-0100@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281819 |
| ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35938 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 (6.9-rc1) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35938 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-35938 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-35938 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938 |
| debian |  | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-35938 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 |

</details>

漏洞分析指导链接：
  https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
 漏洞数据来源:
  openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
 漏洞补丁信息：
  <details>
<summary>详情(点击展开)</summary>

| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源  |
| ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- |
| linux |  | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |

</details>
 
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
 影响性分析说明：
           
 openEuler评分：
   
 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
  1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
  1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen 
**issue处理注意事项:** 
**1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.**
************************************************************************
影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2(5.10.0):
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
issue处理具体操作请参考: 
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35938	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-35938	None	None	https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-35938	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6597a6687af54e2cb58371cf8f6ee4dd85c537de https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/138fdeac75fb7512a7f9f1c3b236cd2e754af793 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae5876b3b7b2243d874e2afa099e7926122087a1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/805a1cdde82fec00c7471a393f4bb437b2741559
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-35938
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-35938	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/linus/1cca1bddf9ef080503c15378cecf4877f7510015

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

CVE-2024-35938

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned
with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel
buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system
memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is
not allowed.

There is a fail report which is caused by it:
kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60
 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0
 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110
 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480
 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0
 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10
 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0
 device_resume+0x104/0x340
 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10
 async_resume+0x1d/0x30
 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120
 process_one_work+0x168/0x330
 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xe8/0x120
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>

Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.
And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less
than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1
allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some
memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure
in those scenarios.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

CVE-2024-35938

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned
with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel
buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system
memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is
not allowed.

There is a fail report which is caused by it:
kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60
 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0
 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110
 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480
 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0
 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10
 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0
 device_resume+0x104/0x340
 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10
 async_resume+0x1d/0x30
 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120
 process_one_work+0x168/0x330
 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xe8/0x120
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>

Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.
And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less
than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1
allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some
memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure
in those scenarios.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

CVE-2024-35938

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned
with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel
buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system
memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is
not allowed.

There is a fail report which is caused by it:
kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60
 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0
 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110
 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480
 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0
 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10
 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0
 device_resume+0x104/0x340
 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10
 async_resume+0x1d/0x30
 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120
 process_one_work+0x168/0x330
 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xe8/0x120
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>

Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.
And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less
than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1
allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some
memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure
in those scenarios.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

CVE-2024-35938

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned
with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel
buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system
memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is
not allowed.

There is a fail report which is caused by it:
kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60
 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0
 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110
 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480
 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0
 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10
 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0
 device_resume+0x104/0x340
 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10
 async_resume+0x1d/0x30
 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120
 process_one_work+0x168/0x330
 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xe8/0x120
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>

Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.
And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less
than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1
allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some
memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure
in those scenarios.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

CVE-2024-35938

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: ath11k: decrease MHI channel buffer length to 8KB

Currently buf_len field of ath11k_mhi_config_qca6390 is assigned
with 0, making MHI use a default size, 64KB, to allocate channel
buffers. This is likely to fail in some scenarios where system
memory is highly fragmented and memory compaction or reclaim is
not allowed.

There is a fail report which is caused by it:
kworker/u32:45: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x40c00(GFP_NOIO|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0
CPU: 0 PID: 19318 Comm: kworker/u32:45 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-1.gae4495f-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) 493b6d5b382c603654d7a81fc3c144d59a1dfceb
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x60
 warn_alloc+0x13a/0x1b0
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0xab/0x210
 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xd3e/0xda0
 __alloc_pages+0x32d/0x350
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __kmalloc_large_node+0x72/0x110
 __kmalloc+0x37c/0x480
 ? mhi_map_single_no_bb+0x77/0xf0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 mhi_prepare_channel+0x127/0x2d0 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 __mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x44/0x80 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 ? __pfx_____mhi_prepare_for_transfer+0x10/0x10 [mhi 40df44e07c05479f7a6e7b90fba9f0e0031a7814]
 device_for_each_child+0x5c/0xa0
 ? __pfx_pci_pm_resume+0x10/0x10
 ath11k_core_resume+0x65/0x100 [ath11k a5094e22d7223135c40d93c8f5321cf09fd85e4e]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 ath11k_pci_pm_resume+0x32/0x60 [ath11k_pci 830b7bfc3ea80ebef32e563cafe2cb55e9cc73ec]
 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
 dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x1e0
 device_resume+0x104/0x340
 ? __pfx_dpm_watchdog_handler+0x10/0x10
 async_resume+0x1d/0x30
 async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0x120
 process_one_work+0x168/0x330
 worker_thread+0x2f5/0x410
 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
 kthread+0xe8/0x120
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
 </TASK>

Actually those buffers are used only by QMI target -> host communication.
And for WCN6855 and QCA6390, the largest packet size for that is less
than 6KB. So change buf_len field to 8KB, which results in order 1
allocation if page size is 4KB. In this way, we can at least save some
memory, and as well as decrease the possibility of allocation failure
in those scenarios.

Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.master(6.1.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否

src-openEuler/kernel

内容风险标识

评论 (10)

src-openEuler/kernel .gitee-modal { width: 500px !important; }

内容风险标识

CVE-2024-35938

评论 (10)

搜索帮助

src-openEuler/kernel