代码拉取完成，页面将自动刷新
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-38613
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V2.0分值：
BaseScore：0.0 None
Vector：CVSS：2.0/
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from prev to next tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both prev and next already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the next thread s status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ( m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread() )but I haven t done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the spinlock recursion warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
漏洞公开时间：2024-06-19 22:15:21
漏洞创建时间：2024-06-19 16:15:48
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38613
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：
| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| linux | https://git.kernel.org/linus/da89ce46f02470ef08f0f580755d14d547da59ed | https://git.kernel.org/linus/533e6903bea0440816a0f517b0845ccea4cc7917 | ubuntu |
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
4.1
Vector：CVSS：2.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2258
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容，页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容，可点击提交进行申诉，我们将尽快为您处理。
@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@zhixiuzhou 2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)
@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 待分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10) |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 待分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10) |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 待分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10) |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 待分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10) |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
wawa
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning to
still be observed.
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
weiwei123
10个月前
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | Reserved. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 3.9 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
郭梦琪
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
8个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
4.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
8个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
4.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
郭梦琪
8个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
4.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
===========================================================
@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation). |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 4.4 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
@gatieme ,@xiexiuqi ,@yangyingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@ci-robot
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #IA6SFZ
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@gatieme ,@xiexiuqi ,@yangyingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@ci-robot
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #IA6SFZ
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
hulk-robot
8个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
4.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 4.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
hulk-robot
8个月前
CVE-2024-38613
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creation
Context switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner across
the switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interrupts
remaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.
This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and context
switching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and
'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of the
status register.
The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The status
register is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.
Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() aka
resume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() then
returns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queue
lock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).
A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is released
in finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with the
current task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning as
reported by Guenter Roeck.
As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit
533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")
but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may well
predate that commit.
Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy for
kernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled when
finally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily when
switching the tasks' register sets in resume().
Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here
Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
4.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 需分析 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:m68k: Fix spinlock race in kernel thread creationContext switching does take care to retain the correct lock owner acrossthe switch from 'prev' to 'next' tasks. This does rely on interruptsremaining disabled for the entire duration of the switch.This condition is guaranteed for normal process creation and contextswitching between already running processes, because both 'prev' and'next' already have interrupts disabled in their saved copies of thestatus register.The situation is different for newly created kernel threads. The statusregister is set to PS_S in copy_thread(), which does leave the IPL at 0.Upon restoring the 'next' thread's status register in switch_to() akaresume(), interrupts then become enabled prematurely. resume() thenreturns via ret_from_kernel_thread() and schedule_tail() where run queuelock is released (see finish_task_switch() and finish_lock_switch()).A timer interrupt calling scheduler_tick() before the lock is releasedin finish_task_switch() will find the lock already taken, with thecurrent task as lock owner. This causes a spinlock recursion warning asreported by Guenter Roeck.As far as I can ascertain, this race has been opened in commit533e6903bea0 ("m68k: split ret_from_fork(), simplify kernel_thread()")but I haven't done a detailed study of kernel history so it may wellpredate that commit.Interrupts cannot be disabled in the saved status register copy forkernel threads (init will complain about interrupts disabled whenfinally starting user space). Disable interrupts temporarily whenswitching the tasks' register sets in resume().Note that a simple oriw 0x700,%sr after restoring sr is not enough here- this leaves enough of a race for the 'spinlock recursion' warning tostill be observed.Tested on ARAnyM and qemu (Quadra 800 emulation).The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38613 to this issue. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 4.1 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.修复是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
@gatieme ,@xiexiuqi ,@yangyingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@linan888
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #IA6SFZ
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3/openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
@gatieme ,@xiexiuqi ,@yangyingliang ,@pi3orama ,@jiaoff ,@linan888
关闭issue前,需要将受影响的分支在合并pr时关联上当前issue编号: #IA6SFZ
受影响分支: openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4
具体操作参考: https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
登录 后才可以发表评论
FileDragTip
