代码拉取完成，页面将自动刷新
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2022-48733
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V2.0分值：
BaseScore：0.0 None
Vector：CVSS：2.0/
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshotAt ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure andthen attach it to the transaction s list of pending snapshots. After thatwe call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jumpto fail label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This canresult in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction s list of pending snapshots;2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don t abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the fail label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction s list;3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there s no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced thefollowing warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: &pending_snapshot->list not removed from listSo fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add thepending snapshot to the transaction s list. Instead add the pendingsnapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any errorreturned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in whichcase the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one canaccess it anymore.
漏洞公开时间：2024-06-20 20:15:11
漏洞创建时间：2024-06-20 21:32:30
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48733
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：
| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| linux | https://git.kernel.org/linus/28b21c558a3753171097193b6f6602a94169093a | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshotAt ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure andthen attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After thatwe call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jumpto 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This canresult in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots;2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list;3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced thefollowing warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from listSo fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add thepending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pendingsnapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any errorreturned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in whichcase the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one canaccess it anymore.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
6.7
Vector：CVSS：2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1839
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容，页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容，可点击提交进行申诉，我们将尽快为您处理。
| 参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
|---|---|---|---|
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48733 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28b21c558a3753171097193b6f6602a94169093a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7b717fa15165d3d9245614680bebc48a52ac05d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9372fa1d73da5f1673921e365d0cd2c27ec7adc2 |
| https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-48733 | None | None | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro |
| https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2022-48733 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28b21c558a3753171097193b6f6602a94169093a https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7b717fa15165d3d9245614680bebc48a52ac05d https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9372fa1d73da5f1673921e365d0cd2c27ec7adc2 |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2022-48733 |
说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2022-48733
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2022-48733
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2022-48733
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2022-48733
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
hulk-robot
10个月前
CVE-2022-48733
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2022-48733 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.7
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
登录 后才可以发表评论
FileDragTip
