CVE-2024-38659

一、漏洞信息
 漏洞编号：[CVE-2024-38659](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659)
 漏洞归属组件：[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel)
 漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
 CVSS V2.0分值：
 BaseScore：0.0 None
 Vector：CVSS：2.0/
 漏洞简述：
 In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.
 漏洞公开时间：2024-06-21 19:15:12
 漏洞创建时间：2024-06-21 11:42:03
 漏洞详情参考链接：
 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659
<details>
<summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary>

| 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 |
| ------- | -------- | -------- |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c |  |
| suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-38659 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-38659.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293655 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226883 |
| redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024062118-CVE-2024-38659-d373@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293655 |
| ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38659 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 (6.10-rc2) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6953-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-2 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-3 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-4 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6979-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6999-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7004-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7005-1 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-38659 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-38659 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659 |
| debian |  | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-38659 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31 |
| cve_search |  | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 |
| mageia |  | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0263.html |

</details>

漏洞分析指导链接：
 https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
 漏洞数据来源:
 openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
 漏洞补丁信息：
 <details>
<summary>详情(点击展开)</summary>

| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源  |
| ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- |
| linux |  | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449 | https://git.kernel.org/linus/f8bd909183acffad68780b10c1cdf36161cfd5d1 | ubuntu |

</details>

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
 影响性分析说明：
        In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.   
 openEuler评分：
  6.3
 Vector：CVSS：2.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H
 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
  1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
  1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen 
**issue处理注意事项:** 
**1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.**
************************************************************************
影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
issue处理具体操作请参考: 
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

<table><tr><th white-space: nowrap;>参考网址</th> <th white-space: nowrap;>关联pr</th> <th white-space: nowrap;>状态</th> <th white-space: nowrap;>补丁链接</th></tr><tr><td rowspan="1">https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38659</td><td>None</td><td>None</td><td><a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5</a></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1">https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38659</td><td>None</td><td>None</td><td><a href=https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro>https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro</a></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1">https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-38659</td><td>None</td><td>None</td><td><a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6638e955ca00c489894789492776842e102af9c</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25571a12fbc8a1283bd8380d461267956fd426f7</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca63fb7af9d3e531aa25f7ae187bfc6c7166ec2d</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b649d7e0cb42a660f0260ef25fd55fdc9c6c600</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8021b94b0412c37bcc79027c2e382086b6ce449</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c0d36972edbe56fcf98899622d9b90ac9965227</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aee1955a1509a921c05c70dad5d6fc8563dfcb31</a> <a href=https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5>https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7077c22f84f41974a711604a42fd0e0684232ee5</a></td></tr><tr><td>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-38659</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-38659</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

> 说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用[CVE补丁工具](https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-agency-manager/cve_tracking/README.md)。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ci-robot 请完成以下操作:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.|
|待分析|2.openEulerScore|2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.**

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.|
|待分析|2.openEulerScore|2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.**

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|  In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue. |
|待分析|2.openEulerScore|2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.**

@chenyi211 请完成以下操作:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|  In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue. |
|待分析|2.openEulerScore|2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.**

@guo-mengqi 请完成以下操作:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.  |
|待分析|2.openEulerScore|2.openEulerScore=> 没有填写或正确填写(0-10)|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.**

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
0
CVSS: 3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
8.master(6.1.0):不受影响
9.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
11.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP1(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
7.master(6.1.0):否
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-Next:否
9.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
10.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
11.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|6.3|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|6.3|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**

CVE-2024-38659

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_port

enic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
is of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributes
IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.
These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)
using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILE
as NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY and
IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validation
using the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exact
size so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes that
enic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bands
read access in the memcpys of the data of these
attributes in enic_set_vf_port.

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
6.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 需分析 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:enic: Validate length of nl attributes in enic_set_vf_portenic_set_vf_port assumes that the nl attribute IFLA_PORT_PROFILEis of length PORT_PROFILE_MAX and that the nl attributesIFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID, IFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID are of length PORT_UUID_MAX.These attributes are validated (in the function do_setlink in rtnetlink.c)using the nla_policy ifla_port_policy. The policy defines IFLA_PORT_PROFILEas NLA_STRING, IFLA_PORT_INSTANCE_UUID as NLA_BINARY andIFLA_PORT_HOST_UUID as NLA_STRING. That means that the length validationusing the policy is for the max size of the attributes and not on exactsize so the length of these attributes might be less than the sizes thatenic_set_vf_port expects. This might cause an out of bandsread access in the memcpys of the data of theseattributes in enic_set_vf_port.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-38659 to this issue.|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|6.3|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.修复是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**

src-openEuler/kernel

内容风险标识

评论 (31)

src-openEuler/kernel .gitee-modal { width: 500px !important; }

内容风险标识

CVE-2024-38659

评论 (31)

搜索帮助

src-openEuler/kernel