CVE-2024-42246

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-42246
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：5.5 Medium
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ( bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean ), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().
漏洞公开时间：2024-08-08 00:15:47
漏洞创建时间：2024-08-08 00:55:01
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42246

更多参考(点击展开)

参考来源	参考链接	来源链接
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02ee1976edb21a96ce8e3fd4ef563f14cc16d041
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d8254e012996cee1a0f9cc920531cb7e4d9a011
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/934247ea65bc5eca8bdb7f8c0ddc15cef992a5d6
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc790261218952635f846aaf90bcc0974f6f62c6
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6
suse_bugzilla	http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-42246	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-42246.mbox	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
suse_bugzilla	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228989
ubuntu	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42246	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/linus/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde (6.10)	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42246	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-42246	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
ubuntu	https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-42246	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246
debian		https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-42246
anolis		https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2024-42246

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
其它
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)

影响的包	修复补丁	问题引入补丁	来源
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde		nvd
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414		nvd
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6		nvd
	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6		nvd
linux	https://git.kernel.org/linus/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde	https://git.kernel.org/linus/d74bad4e74ee373787a9ae24197c17b7cdc428d5	ubuntu
linux	https://git.kernel.org/linus/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde	https://git.kernel.org/linus/4fbac77d2d092b475dda9eea66da674369665427	ubuntu

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
5.master:不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
1.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不修复-超出修复范围
5.master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

三、漏洞修复
安全公告链接：https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1078

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen 
**issue处理注意事项:** 
**1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.**
************************************************************************
影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
issue处理具体操作请参考: 
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42246	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-42246	None	None	https://discourse.ubuntu.com/c/ubuntu-pro
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-42246	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6c686c01c5f12ff8f7264e0ddf71df6cb0d4414 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2431e7db0fe0daccb2f06bb0d23740affcd2fa6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f388cfd913a2b96c05339a335f365795db1b36b6 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/626dfed5fa3bfb41e0dffd796032b555b69f9cde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-42246
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-42246

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket

When using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. This
causes xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causing
the kernel to potentially freeze up.

Neil suggested:

This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready
to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more
likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.

ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different error
can be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernels
which do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err
instead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap for
consistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	需分析	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socketWhen using a BPF program on kernel_connect(), the call can return -EPERM. Thiscauses xs_tcp_setup_socket() to loop forever, filling up the syslog and causingthe kernel to potentially freeze up.Neil suggested: This will propagate -EPERM up into other layers which might not be ready to handle it. It might be safer to map EPERM to an error we would be more likely to expect from the network system - such as ECONNREFUSED or ENETDOWN.ECONNREFUSED as error seems reasonable. For programs setting a different errorcan be out of reach (see handling in 4fbac77d2d09) in particular on kernelswhich do not have f10d05966196 ("bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -errinstead of allow boolean"), thus given that it is better to simply remap forconsistent behavior. UDP does handle EPERM in xs_udp_send_request().The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-42246 to this issue.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
已分析	5.修复是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
Reserved.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否

===========================================================

CVE-2024-42246

影响性分析说明：
Reserved.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响

原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(23.08.5):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否

===========================================================

CVE-2024-42246

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

@ 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:

状态	分析项目	内容
已分析	1.影响性分析说明	Reserved.
已分析	2.openEulerScore	5.5
已分析	3.openEulerVector	AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
已分析	4.受影响版本排查	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
已分析	5.是否涉及abi变化	openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
已分析	6.原因说明	openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.

src-openEuler/kernel

内容风险标识

评论 (26)

src-openEuler/kernel .gitee-modal { width: 500px !important; }

内容风险标识

CVE-2024-42246

评论 (26)

搜索帮助

src-openEuler/kernel