Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
128
Star
73
Fork
331
src-openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2024-44975
Done
#IAOY14
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2024-09-05 06:52
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-44975](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_updateWe find a bug as below:BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000003PGD 0 P4D 0Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: bash Tainted: G W I 6.6.0-10893-g60d6Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/4RIP: 0010:partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600Code: 01 48 85 d2 74 0d 48 83 05 29 3f f8 03 01 f3 48 0f bc c2 89 c0 48 9RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fdbc58 EFLAGS: 00000202RAX: 0000000100000003 RBX: ffff888100b3dfa0 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000002fe80RBP: ffff888100b3dfb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000R10: ffffc90000fdbcb0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000002R13: ffff888100a92b48 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000FS: 00007f44a5425740(0000) GS:ffff888237d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 0000000100030973 CR3: 000000010722c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x8c/0xa0 ? __die_body+0x23/0xa0 ? __die+0x3a/0x50 ? page_fault_oops+0x1d2/0x5c0 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? search_module_extables+0x2a/0xb0 ? search_exception_tables+0x67/0x90 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x144/0x1b0 ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x211/0x360 ? up_read+0x3b/0x50 ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a/0x30 ? exc_page_fault+0x890/0xd90 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0xf0/0x600 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x806/0xdc0 update_partition_sd_lb+0x118/0x130 cpuset_write_resmask+0xffc/0x1420 cgroup_file_write+0xb2/0x290 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x194/0x290 new_sync_write+0xeb/0x160 vfs_write+0x16f/0x1d0 ksys_write+0x81/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2f25/0x4630 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2RIP: 0033:0x7f44a553c887It can be reproduced with cammands:cd /sys/fs/cgroup/mkdir testcd test/echo +cpuset > ../cgroup.subtree_controlecho root > cpuset.cpus.partitioncat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpus.effective0-3echo 0-3 > cpuset.cpus // taking away all cpus from rootThis issue is caused by the incorrect rebuilding of scheduling domains.In this scenario, test/cpuset.cpus.partition should be an invalid rootand should not trigger the rebuilding of scheduling domains. When callingupdate_parent_effective_cpumask with partcmd_update, if newmask is notnull, it should recheck newmask whether there are cpus is availablefor parect/cs that has tasks. 漏洞公开时间:2024-09-05 04:15:07 漏洞创建时间:2024-09-27 02:08:13 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-44975 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-44975.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309838 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024090442-CVE-2024-44975-7c21@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309838 | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a (6.11-rc5) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-44975 | | anolis | | https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2024-44975 | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44975 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-44975.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-44975 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-44975.html | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | | nvd | | linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://git.kernel.org/linus/0c7f293efc87a06b51db9aa65256f8cb0a5a0a21 | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_updateWe find a bug as below:BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000003PGD 0 P4D 0Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: bash Tainted: G W I 6.6.0-10893-g60d6Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/4RIP: 0010:partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600Code: 01 48 85 d2 74 0d 48 83 05 29 3f f8 03 01 f3 48 0f bc c2 89 c0 48 9RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fdbc58 EFLAGS: 00000202RAX: 0000000100000003 RBX: ffff888100b3dfa0 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000002fe80RBP: ffff888100b3dfb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000R10: ffffc90000fdbcb0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000002R13: ffff888100a92b48 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000FS: 00007f44a5425740(0000) GS:ffff888237d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 0000000100030973 CR3: 000000010722c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x8c/0xa0 ? __die_body+0x23/0xa0 ? __die+0x3a/0x50 ? page_fault_oops+0x1d2/0x5c0 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? search_module_extables+0x2a/0xb0 ? search_exception_tables+0x67/0x90 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x144/0x1b0 ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x211/0x360 ? up_read+0x3b/0x50 ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a/0x30 ? exc_page_fault+0x890/0xd90 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0xf0/0x600 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x806/0xdc0 update_partition_sd_lb+0x118/0x130 cpuset_write_resmask+0xffc/0x1420 cgroup_file_write+0xb2/0x290 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x194/0x290 new_sync_write+0xeb/0x160 vfs_write+0x16f/0x1d0 ksys_write+0x81/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2f25/0x4630 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2RIP: 0033:0x7f44a553c887It can be reproduced with cammands:cd /sys/fs/cgroup/mkdir testcd test/echo +cpuset > ../cgroup.subtree_controlecho root > cpuset.cpus.partitioncat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpus.effective0-3echo 0-3 > cpuset.cpus // taking away all cpus from rootThis issue is caused by the incorrect rebuilding of scheduling domains.In this scenario, test/cpuset.cpus.partition should be an invalid rootand should not trigger the rebuilding of scheduling domains. When callingupdate_parent_effective_cpumask with partcmd_update, if newmask is notnull, it should recheck newmask whether there are cpus is availablefor parect/cs that has tasks. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复 2.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 4.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1097
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-44975](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_updateWe find a bug as below:BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000003PGD 0 P4D 0Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: bash Tainted: G W I 6.6.0-10893-g60d6Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/4RIP: 0010:partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600Code: 01 48 85 d2 74 0d 48 83 05 29 3f f8 03 01 f3 48 0f bc c2 89 c0 48 9RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fdbc58 EFLAGS: 00000202RAX: 0000000100000003 RBX: ffff888100b3dfa0 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000002fe80RBP: ffff888100b3dfb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000R10: ffffc90000fdbcb0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000002R13: ffff888100a92b48 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000FS: 00007f44a5425740(0000) GS:ffff888237d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 0000000100030973 CR3: 000000010722c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x8c/0xa0 ? __die_body+0x23/0xa0 ? __die+0x3a/0x50 ? page_fault_oops+0x1d2/0x5c0 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? search_module_extables+0x2a/0xb0 ? search_exception_tables+0x67/0x90 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x144/0x1b0 ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x211/0x360 ? up_read+0x3b/0x50 ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a/0x30 ? exc_page_fault+0x890/0xd90 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0xf0/0x600 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x806/0xdc0 update_partition_sd_lb+0x118/0x130 cpuset_write_resmask+0xffc/0x1420 cgroup_file_write+0xb2/0x290 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x194/0x290 new_sync_write+0xeb/0x160 vfs_write+0x16f/0x1d0 ksys_write+0x81/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2f25/0x4630 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2RIP: 0033:0x7f44a553c887It can be reproduced with cammands:cd /sys/fs/cgroup/mkdir testcd test/echo +cpuset > ../cgroup.subtree_controlecho root > cpuset.cpus.partitioncat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpus.effective0-3echo 0-3 > cpuset.cpus // taking away all cpus from rootThis issue is caused by the incorrect rebuilding of scheduling domains.In this scenario, test/cpuset.cpus.partition should be an invalid rootand should not trigger the rebuilding of scheduling domains. When callingupdate_parent_effective_cpumask with partcmd_update, if newmask is notnull, it should recheck newmask whether there are cpus is availablefor parect/cs that has tasks. 漏洞公开时间:2024-09-05 04:15:07 漏洞创建时间:2024-09-27 02:08:13 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-44975 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-44975.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309838 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230237 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024090442-CVE-2024-44975-7c21@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309838 | | ubuntu | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/linus/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a (6.11-rc5) | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | ubuntu | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-44975 | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-44975 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-44975 | | anolis | | https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2024-44975 | | amazon_linux_explore | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44975 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-44975.html | | amazon_linux_explore | https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-44975 | https://explore.alas.aws.amazon.com/CVE-2024-44975.html | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73d6c6cf8ef6a3c532aa159f5114077746a372d6 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | | nvd | | linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/959ab6350add903e352890af53e86663739fcb9a | https://git.kernel.org/linus/0c7f293efc87a06b51db9aa65256f8cb0a5a0a21 | ubuntu | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:cgroup/cpuset: fix panic caused by partcmd_updateWe find a bug as below:BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000003PGD 0 P4D 0Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTICPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: bash Tainted: G W I 6.6.0-10893-g60d6Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/4RIP: 0010:partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600Code: 01 48 85 d2 74 0d 48 83 05 29 3f f8 03 01 f3 48 0f bc c2 89 c0 48 9RSP: 0018:ffffc90000fdbc58 EFLAGS: 00000202RAX: 0000000100000003 RBX: ffff888100b3dfa0 RCX: 0000000000000000RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000002fe80RBP: ffff888100b3dfb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000R10: ffffc90000fdbcb0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000002R13: ffff888100a92b48 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000FS: 00007f44a5425740(0000) GS:ffff888237d80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033CR2: 0000000100030973 CR3: 000000010722c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x8c/0xa0 ? __die_body+0x23/0xa0 ? __die+0x3a/0x50 ? page_fault_oops+0x1d2/0x5c0 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? search_module_extables+0x2a/0xb0 ? search_exception_tables+0x67/0x90 ? kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0x144/0x1b0 ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x211/0x360 ? up_read+0x3b/0x50 ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x1a/0x30 ? exc_page_fault+0x890/0xd90 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? __lock_acquire.constprop.0+0x24f/0x8d0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0x483/0x600 ? partition_sched_domains_locked+0xf0/0x600 rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x806/0xdc0 update_partition_sd_lb+0x118/0x130 cpuset_write_resmask+0xffc/0x1420 cgroup_file_write+0xb2/0x290 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x194/0x290 new_sync_write+0xeb/0x160 vfs_write+0x16f/0x1d0 ksys_write+0x81/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x21/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2f25/0x4630 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2RIP: 0033:0x7f44a553c887It can be reproduced with cammands:cd /sys/fs/cgroup/mkdir testcd test/echo +cpuset > ../cgroup.subtree_controlecho root > cpuset.cpus.partitioncat /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset.cpus.effective0-3echo 0-3 > cpuset.cpus // taking away all cpus from rootThis issue is caused by the incorrect rebuilding of scheduling domains.In this scenario, test/cpuset.cpus.partition should be an invalid rootand should not trigger the rebuilding of scheduling domains. When callingupdate_parent_effective_cpumask with partcmd_update, if newmask is notnull, it should recheck newmask whether there are cpus is availablefor parect/cs that has tasks. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复 2.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 4.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1097
Comments (
25
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
sanglipeng
sanglipeng
Assignee
Collaborator
+Assign
+Mention
Labels
CVE/FIXED
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(3)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register