登录
注册
开源
企业版
高校版
搜索
帮助中心
使用条款
关于我们
开源
企业版
高校版
私有云
模力方舟
AI 队友
登录
注册
代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
仓库状态说明
开源项目
>
其他开源
>
操作系统
&&
捐赠
捐赠前请先登录
取消
前往登录
扫描微信二维码支付
取消
支付完成
支付提示
将跳转至支付宝完成支付
确定
取消
Watch
不关注
关注所有动态
仅关注版本发行动态
关注但不提醒动态
128
Star
73
Fork
331
src-openEuler
/
kernel
关闭
代码
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
统计
流水线
服务
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
质量分析
Jenkins for Gitee
腾讯云托管
腾讯云 Serverless
悬镜安全
阿里云 SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
我知道了,不再自动展开
更新失败,请稍后重试!
移除标识
内容风险标识
本任务被
标识为内容中包含有代码安全 Bug 、隐私泄露等敏感信息,仓库外成员不可访问
CVE-2024-49878
已完成
#IAYRCE
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
拥有者
创建于
2024-10-22 04:23
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-49878](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49878) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related toCXL memory may look like something as follows.490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem)Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() duringonlining CXL memory, which makes System RAM (kmem) a descendant of CXLWindow X . This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all SystemRAM resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead tobugs.For example, when the following command line is executed to write somememory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing /dev/mem : Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/sthe command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. Itshould be Operation not permitted instead of Bad address . Moreseriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passesincorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap()isn t allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. Duringcommand executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log forcalling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53The details of command execution process are as follows. In the aboveresource tree, System RAM is a descendant of CXL Window 0 instead of atop level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAMresources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks thetop level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1(allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn t allow to map System RAM and reject theaccess.So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with theresource tree with System RAM not at top level as above. To fix it, ifwe found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to searchmatched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss anymatched resources in resource tree anymore.In the new implementation, an example resource tree|------------- CXL Window 0 ------------||-- System RAM --|will behave similar as the following fake resource tree forregion_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ),|-- System RAM --||-- CXL Window 0a --|Where CXL Window 0a is part of the original CXL Window 0 thatisn t covered by System RAM . 漏洞公开时间:2024-10-22 02:15:09 漏洞创建时间:2024-10-22 04:23:17 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49878 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06ff97a20b8c9e9d256b0d2c3e87f78f8ccea3de | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d5f85f1b7db79c75c9e07d6571ce2a7bdf725c4 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/333fbaf6864a4ca031367eb947961a1f3484d337 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/393331e16ce205e036e58b3d8ca4ee2e635f21d9 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b90d2eb451b357681063ba4552b10b39d7ad885 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a6fef7d22a1d952aed68584d3fcc0d018d2bdc3 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/927abc5b7d6d2c2e936bec5a2f71d9512c5e72f7 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4afe4183ec77f230851ea139d91e5cf2644c68b | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-49878 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06ff97a20b8c9e9d256b0d2c3e87f78f8ccea3de | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d5f85f1b7db79c75c9e07d6571ce2a7bdf725c4 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/393331e16ce205e036e58b3d8ca4ee2e635f21d9 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b90d2eb451b357681063ba4552b10b39d7ad885 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a6fef7d22a1d952aed68584d3fcc0d018d2bdc3 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/927abc5b7d6d2c2e936bec5a2f71d9512c5e72f7 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4afe4183ec77f230851ea139d91e5cf2644c68b | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-49878.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320527 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024102115-CVE-2024-49878-8099@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320527 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-49878 | | mageia | | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0345.html | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> 无 </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related toCXL memory may look like something as follows.490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem)Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() duringonlining CXL memory, which makes System RAM (kmem) a descendant of CXLWindow X . This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all SystemRAM resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead tobugs.For example, when the following command line is executed to write somememory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing /dev/mem : Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/sthe command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. Itshould be Operation not permitted instead of Bad address . Moreseriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passesincorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap()isn t allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. Duringcommand executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log forcalling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53The details of command execution process are as follows. In the aboveresource tree, System RAM is a descendant of CXL Window 0 instead of atop level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAMresources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks thetop level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1(allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn t allow to map System RAM and reject theaccess.So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with theresource tree with System RAM not at top level as above. To fix it, ifwe found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to searchmatched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss anymatched resources in resource tree anymore.In the new implementation, an example resource tree|------------- CXL Window 0 ------------||-- System RAM --|will behave similar as the following fake resource tree forregion_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ),|-- System RAM --||-- CXL Window 0a --|Where CXL Window 0a is part of the original CXL Window 0 thatisn t covered by System RAM . openEuler评分: 3.9 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 6.master(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.6.0): 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90): 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0): 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0): 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0): 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0): 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0): 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1: 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2426
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2024-49878](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49878) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related toCXL memory may look like something as follows.490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem)Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() duringonlining CXL memory, which makes System RAM (kmem) a descendant of CXLWindow X . This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all SystemRAM resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead tobugs.For example, when the following command line is executed to write somememory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing /dev/mem : Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/sthe command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. Itshould be Operation not permitted instead of Bad address . Moreseriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passesincorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap()isn t allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. Duringcommand executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log forcalling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53The details of command execution process are as follows. In the aboveresource tree, System RAM is a descendant of CXL Window 0 instead of atop level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAMresources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks thetop level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1(allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn t allow to map System RAM and reject theaccess.So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with theresource tree with System RAM not at top level as above. To fix it, ifwe found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to searchmatched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss anymatched resources in resource tree anymore.In the new implementation, an example resource tree|------------- CXL Window 0 ------------||-- System RAM --|will behave similar as the following fake resource tree forregion_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ),|-- System RAM --||-- CXL Window 0a --|Where CXL Window 0a is part of the original CXL Window 0 thatisn t covered by System RAM . 漏洞公开时间:2024-10-22 02:15:09 漏洞创建时间:2024-10-22 04:23:17 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49878 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06ff97a20b8c9e9d256b0d2c3e87f78f8ccea3de | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d5f85f1b7db79c75c9e07d6571ce2a7bdf725c4 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/333fbaf6864a4ca031367eb947961a1f3484d337 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/393331e16ce205e036e58b3d8ca4ee2e635f21d9 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b90d2eb451b357681063ba4552b10b39d7ad885 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a6fef7d22a1d952aed68584d3fcc0d018d2bdc3 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/927abc5b7d6d2c2e936bec5a2f71d9512c5e72f7 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4afe4183ec77f230851ea139d91e5cf2644c68b | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-49878 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49878 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06ff97a20b8c9e9d256b0d2c3e87f78f8ccea3de | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d5f85f1b7db79c75c9e07d6571ce2a7bdf725c4 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/393331e16ce205e036e58b3d8ca4ee2e635f21d9 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b90d2eb451b357681063ba4552b10b39d7ad885 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a6fef7d22a1d952aed68584d3fcc0d018d2bdc3 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/927abc5b7d6d2c2e936bec5a2f71d9512c5e72f7 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4afe4183ec77f230851ea139d91e5cf2644c68b | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-49878.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320527 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232340 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024102115-CVE-2024-49878-8099@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320527 | | debian | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-49878 | | mageia | | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0345.html | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> 无 </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related toCXL memory may look like something as follows.490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem)Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() duringonlining CXL memory, which makes System RAM (kmem) a descendant of CXLWindow X . This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all SystemRAM resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead tobugs.For example, when the following command line is executed to write somememory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem, $ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing /dev/mem : Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/sthe command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. Itshould be Operation not permitted instead of Bad address . Moreseriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passesincorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap()isn t allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. Duringcommand executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log forcalling ioremap() on system RAM. ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53The details of command execution process are as follows. In the aboveresource tree, System RAM is a descendant of CXL Window 0 instead of atop level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAMresources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks thetop level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1(allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn t allow to map System RAM and reject theaccess.So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with theresource tree with System RAM not at top level as above. To fix it, ifwe found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to searchmatched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss anymatched resources in resource tree anymore.In the new implementation, an example resource tree|------------- CXL Window 0 ------------||-- System RAM --|will behave similar as the following fake resource tree forregion_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ),|-- System RAM --||-- CXL Window 0a --|Where CXL Window 0a is part of the original CXL Window 0 thatisn t covered by System RAM . openEuler评分: 3.9 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 6.master(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.6.0): 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90): 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0): 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0): 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0): 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0): 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0): 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1: 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2426
评论 (
7
)
登录
后才可以发表评论
状态
已完成
待办的
已挂起
进行中
已完成
已拒绝
负责人
未设置
标签
CVE/FIXED
sig/Kernel
未设置
项目
未立项任务
未立项任务
Pull Requests
未关联
未关联
关联的 Pull Requests 被合并后可能会关闭此 issue
分支
未关联
分支 (
-
)
标签 (
-
)
开始日期   -   截止日期
-
置顶选项
不置顶
置顶等级:高
置顶等级:中
置顶等级:低
优先级
不指定
严重
主要
次要
不重要
预计工期
(小时)
参与者(2)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
点此查找更多帮助
搜索帮助
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
评论
仓库举报
回到顶部
登录提示
该操作需登录 Gitee 帐号,请先登录后再操作。
立即登录
没有帐号,去注册