CVE-2022-48983

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2022-48983
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：5.5 Medium
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg]
漏洞公开时间：2024-10-22 04:15:10
漏洞创建时间：2024-10-22 05:01:09
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48983

更多参考(点击展开)

参考来源	参考链接	来源链接
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c
suse_bugzilla	http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-48983	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48983	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2022/CVE-2022-48983.mbox	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
suse_bugzilla	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959
redhat_bugzilla	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024102147-CVE-2022-48983-7e0c@gregkh/T	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)

影响的包	修复版本	修复补丁	问题引入补丁	来源
		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5		nvd
		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf		nvd
		https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c		nvd

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg]
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
5.master(6.6.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否

原因说明：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
5.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否))不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.

影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):

issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

CVE-2022-48983

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()

Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows:

BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3
Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955

CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
Call Trace:

dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134
? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3
kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0
? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3
kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190
io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3
task_work_run+0x164/0x250
? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30
get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440
? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0
? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0
? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70
? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470
? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0
? putname+0xfe/0x140
? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10
? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100
? putname+0xfe/0x140
? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50
do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0023:0x0
Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()
isn't synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. The
execution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the task
itself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we're canceling all
work items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspace
rather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we can
find current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.

It's safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the two
paths are done by the task itself.

[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg]

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否