Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
128
Star
73
Fork
331
src-openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2022-48983
Done
#IAYREG
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2024-10-22 05:01
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2022-48983](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48983) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg] 漏洞公开时间:2024-10-22 04:15:10 漏洞创建时间:2024-10-22 05:01:09 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48983 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-48983 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48983 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2022/CVE-2022-48983.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024102147-CVE-2022-48983-7e0c@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | | nvd | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg] openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2022-48983](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48983) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:5.5 Medium Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg] 漏洞公开时间:2024-10-22 04:15:10 漏洞创建时间:2024-10-22 05:01:09 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48983 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | | | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | | | suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-48983 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48983 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2022/CVE-2022-48983.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231959 | | redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024102147-CVE-2022-48983-7e0c@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320786 | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: openBrain开源漏洞感知系统 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/998b30c3948e4d0b1097e639918c5cff332acac5 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d91edca1943453aaaba4f380f6f364346222e5cf | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f895511de9d27fff71dad2c234ad53b4afd2b06c | | nvd | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()Syzkaller reports a NULL deref bug as follows: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 Read of size 4 at addr 0000000000000138 by task file1/1955 CPU: 1 PID: 1955 Comm: file1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-00103-gef4d3ea40565 #75 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1f0 ? io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 kasan_check_range+0x140/0x190 io_tctx_exit_cb+0x53/0xd3 task_work_run+0x164/0x250 ? task_work_cancel+0x30/0x30 get_signal+0x1c3/0x2440 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? exit_signals+0x8b0/0x8b0 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x3b/0x70 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x50/0x230 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x82/0x2470 ? kmem_cache_free+0x260/0x4b0 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? get_sigframe_size+0x10/0x10 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x226/0x710 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x79/0x100 ? putname+0xfe/0x140 ? do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x238/0x710 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x42/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0023:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 002b:00000000fffb7790 EFLAGS: 00000200 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000000b RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...This happens because the adding of task_work from io_ring_exit_work()isn t synchronized with canceling all work items from eg exec. Theexecution of the two are ordered in that they are both run by the taskitself, but if io_tctx_exit_cb() is queued while we re canceling allwork items off exec AND gets executed when the task exits to userspacerather than in the main loop in io_uring_cancel_generic(), then we canfind current->io_uring == NULL and hit the above crash.It s safe to add this NULL check here, because the execution of the twopaths are done by the task itself.[axboe: add code comment and also put an explanation in the commit msg] openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.master(6.6.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
Comments (
14
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
Labels
CVE/UNAFFECTED
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(3)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register