代码拉取完成，页面将自动刷新
一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-50195
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.0,6.1.14,6.1.19,6.1.5,6.1.6,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：5.5 Medium
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP corechecked timespec64 struct s tv_sec and tv_nsec range before callingptp->info->settime64().As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative ortp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition isconsistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time isin a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly towrite registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layerhas checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such ashclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
漏洞公开时间：2024-11-08 14:15:16
漏洞创建时间：2024-11-08 14:32:52
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50195
漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.master(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
原因说明：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):正常修复
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容，页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容，可点击提交进行申诉，我们将尽快为您处理。
@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen
issue处理注意事项:
1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;
3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.
影响性分析说明:
openEuler评分: (评分和向量)
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
原因说明：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
原因说明填写请参考下方表格(注意：版本是否受影响和版本的原因说明必须对应，例如master版本分支受影响，那原因说明只能是受影响对应的原因之一!)：
| 分支状态 | 原因说明 |
|---|---|
| 受影响 | 正常修复 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-漏洞仍在分析中 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-暂无解决方案或补丁 |
| 受影响 | 暂不修复-待升级版本修复 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-超出修复范围 |
| 受影响 | 不修复-特殊原因导致不再修复 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-组件不存在 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-已有内置的内联控制或缓解措施 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不在执行路径 |
| 不受影响 | 不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 |
issue处理具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142
hulk-robot
5个月前
CVE-2024-50195
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,
which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()
only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is
in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()
in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@zhixiuzhou 6.原因说明=> 分支 master 结果填写错误
@ci-robot 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@ci-robot 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
hulk-robot
5个月前
CVE-2024-50195
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,
which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()
only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is
in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()
in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@zhixiuzhou 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
@chenyi211 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@linan888 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
@openeuler-sync-bot 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
hulk-robot
5个月前
CVE-2024-50195
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,
which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()
only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is
in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()
in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@zhixiuzhou 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
hulk-robot
5个月前
CVE-2024-50195
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,
which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()
only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is
in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()
in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.master(6.1.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(6.1.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
@zhixiuzhou 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
@linan888 4.受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)=> 没有分析或未按正确格式填写，涉及分支: [openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1]
请确认分析内容的准确性,待分析内容请填写完整,否则将无法关闭当前issue.
郭梦琪
3个月前
CVE-2024-50195
影响性分析说明：
Reserved.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
CVSS: 3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.master(23.08.5):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
===========================================================
@gitee-cmd ,@gwei3 ,@zhujianwei001 ,@yanxiaobing2020 ,@liujingang09 ,@luoyukai The CVE score needs to be reviewed (the review instruction /approve or /reject means agreement and rejection).
@guo-mengqi ,请给出NVD评分和openEuler评分不一致的理由
@gitee-cmd ,@gwei3 ,@zhujianwei001 ,@yanxiaobing2020 ,@liujingang09 ,@luoyukai 经过 cve-manager 解析 openEuler评分 已改变 需要您及时进行审核,以便maintainer进行后续操作.
郭梦琪
3个月前
CVE-2024-50195
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
@sanglipeng 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态 | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 已分析 | 1.影响性分析说明 | Reserved. |
| 已分析 | 2.openEulerScore | 5.5 |
| 已分析 | 3.openEulerVector | AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
| 已分析 | 4.受影响版本排查 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响 |
| 已分析 | 5.是否涉及abi变化 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否 |
| 已分析 | 6.原因说明 | openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 |
请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.
登录 后才可以发表评论
FileDragTip
