CVE-2025-21970

一、漏洞信息
 漏洞编号：[CVE-2025-21970](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21970)
 漏洞归属组件：[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel)
 漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0
 CVSS V3.0分值：
  BaseScore：N/A None
  Vector：CVSS：3.0/
 漏洞简述：
  In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state checkWhen removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event istriggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all theoffloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returnsfalse if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead ofthe alive PF, and the flush is skipped.Besides, the bridge fdb entry s lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridgeevent handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can beignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueuekeeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridgenotifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bondnetdev which is already destroyed.To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked incommit 15f8f168952f ( net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when addingbond to bridge ), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomesinvalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:  <TASK>  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60  ? die+0x38/0x60  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390  worker_thread+0x106/0x250  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110  kthread+0xb7/0xe0  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20  </TASK>
 漏洞公开时间：2025-04-02 00:15:28
 漏洞创建时间：2025-04-02 01:03:05
 漏洞详情参考链接：
  https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21970
<details>
<summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary>

| 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 |
| ------- | -------- | -------- |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbb |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7f |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4 |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25ca |  |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f90c4d6572488e2bad38cca00f1c59174a538a1a |  |
| suse_bugzilla | http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2025-21970 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21970 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbb | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7f | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25ca | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2356661 | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| suse_bugzilla | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2025/CVE-2025-21970.mbox | https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240819 |
| redhat_bugzilla | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025040146-CVE-2025-21970-fbac@gregkh/T | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2356661 |
| anolis |  | https://anas.openanolis.cn/cves/detail/CVE-2025-21970 |
| mageia |  | http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2025-0142.html |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbb | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7f | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1 | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4 | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25ca | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f90c4d6572488e2bad38cca00f1c59174a538a1a | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |
| osv | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-21970 | https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21970 |

</details>

漏洞分析指导链接：
  https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
 漏洞数据来源:
  openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
 漏洞补丁信息：
  <details>
<summary>详情(点击展开)</summary>

| 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源  |
| ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- |
| linux_kernel | 6.1.132 | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1Issue | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f | linuxkernelcves |
| linux_kernel | 6.6.84 | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4Issue | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f | linuxkernelcves |
| linux_kernel | 6.12.20 | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25caIssue | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f | linuxkernelcves |
| linux_kernel | 6.13.8 | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7fIssue | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f | linuxkernelcves |
| linux_kernel | 6.14 | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbbPlease | https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=ff9b7521468bc2909293c1cda66a245a49688f6f | linuxkernelcves |

</details>

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
 影响性分析说明：
  In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state checkWhen removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event istriggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all theoffloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returnsfalse if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead ofthe alive PF, and the flush is skipped.Besides, the bridge fdb entry s lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridgeevent handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can beignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueuekeeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridgenotifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bondnetdev which is already destroyed.To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked incommit 15f8f168952f ( net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when addingbond to bridge ), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomesinvalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:  <TASK>  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60  ? die+0x38/0x60  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390  worker_thread+0x106/0x250  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110  kthread+0xb7/0xe0  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20  </TASK>
 openEuler评分：
  5.5
 Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
  1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
4.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响
7.master(6.6.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
  1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
3.master(6.6.0):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
  1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
6.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen 
**issue处理注意事项:** 
**1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.**
************************************************************************
影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):

原因说明：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):

issue处理具体操作请参考: 
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21970
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-21970
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2025-21970	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7bf259a04271165ae667ad21cfc60c6413f25ca https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b8eeed4fb105770ce6dc84a2c6ef953c7b71cbb https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5dd8bf6ab1d6db40f5d09603759fa88caec19e7f https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/86ff45f5f61ae1d0d17f0f6d8797b052eacfd8f1 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd7e3a42800743a7748c83243e4cafc1b995d4c4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-21970
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-21970
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2025-21970

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

CVE-2025-21970

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check

When removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is
triggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all the
offloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returns
false if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,
mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead of
the alive PF, and the flush is skipped.

Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridge
event handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can be
ignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,
and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.

To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueue
keeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridge
notifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bond
netdev which is already destroyed.

To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked in
commit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when adding
bond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomes
invalid state after initialization.

Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1
 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core]
 RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]
 Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7
 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297
 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff
 RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0
 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60
 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60
  ? die+0x38/0x60
  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120
  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0
  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50
  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30
  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]
  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390
  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0
  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]
  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390
  worker_thread+0x106/0x250
  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110
  kthread+0xb7/0xe0
  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
  </TASK>

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响

原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
3.master(23.08.5):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否

===========================================================

@CTC-XiboWang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state checkWhen removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event istriggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all theoffloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returnsfalse if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead ofthe alive PF, and the flush is skipped.Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridgeevent handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can beignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueuekeeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridgenotifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bondnetdev which is already destroyed.To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked incommit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when addingbond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomesinvalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:  <TASK>  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60  ? die+0x38/0x60  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390  worker_thread+0x106/0x250  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110  kthread+0xb7/0xe0  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20  </TASK>|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|5.5|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否|
|已分析|6.原因说明|openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**

CVE-2025-21970

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state check

When removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event is
triggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all the
offloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returns
false if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,
mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead of
the alive PF, and the flush is skipped.

Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridge
event handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can be
ignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,
and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.

To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueue
keeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridge
notifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bond
netdev which is already destroyed.

To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked in
commit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when adding
bond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomes
invalid state after initialization.

Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1
 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core]
 RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]
 Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7
 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297
 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff
 RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0
 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60
 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60
  ? die+0x38/0x60
  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120
  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0
  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50
  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30
  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]
  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390
  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0
  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]
  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390
  worker_thread+0x106/0x250
  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110
  kthread+0xb7/0xe0
  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
  </TASK>

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响

原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
4.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
3.master(23.08.5):否
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否

===========================================================

@CTC-XiboWang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/mlx5: Bridge, fix the crash caused by LAG state checkWhen removing LAG device from bridge, NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER event istriggered. Driver finds the lower devices (PFs) to flush all theoffloaded entries. And mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb is checked, it returnsfalse if one of PF is unloaded. In such case,mlx5_esw_bridge_lag_rep_get() and its caller return NULL, instead ofthe alive PF, and the flush is skipped.Besides, the bridge fdb entry's lastuse is updated in mlx5 bridgeevent handler. But this SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE event can beignored in this case because the upper interface for bond is deleted,and the entry will never be aged because lastuse is never updated.To make things worse, as the entry is alive, mlx5 bridge workqueuekeeps sending that event, which is then handled by kernel bridgenotifier. It causes the following crash when accessing the passed bondnetdev which is already destroyed.To fix this issue, remove such checks. LAG state is already checked incommit 15f8f168952f ("net/mlx5: Bridge, verify LAG state when addingbond to bridge"), driver still need to skip offload if LAG becomesinvalid state after initialization. Oops: stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 23695 Comm: kworker/u40:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.11.0_mlnx #1 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_bridge_wq mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work [mlx5_core] RIP: 0010:br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge] Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 02 48 f7 00 00 02 00 00 74 69 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b a8 08 01 00 00 48 85 ed 74 4a 48 83 fe 02 48 89 d3 <4c> 8b 65 00 74 23 76 49 48 83 fe 05 74 7e 48 83 fe 06 75 2f 0f b7 RSP: 0018:ffffc900092cfda0 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: ffff888123bfe000 RBX: ffffc900092cfe08 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: ffffc900092cfe08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffa0c585f0 RBP: 6669746f6e690a30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff888123ae92c8 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: fefefefefefefeff R12: ffff888123ae9c60 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc900092cfe08 R15: 0000000000000000 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f15914c8734 CR3: 0000000002830005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:  <TASK>  ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60  ? die+0x38/0x60  ? do_trap+0x10b/0x120  ? do_error_trap+0x64/0xa0  ? exc_stack_segment+0x33/0x50  ? asm_exc_stack_segment+0x22/0x30  ? br_switchdev_event+0x2c/0x110 [bridge]  ? sched_balance_newidle.isra.149+0x248/0x390  notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0xa0  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20  mlx5_esw_bridge_update+0xec/0x170 [mlx5_core]  mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x19/0x40 [mlx5_core]  process_scheduled_works+0x81/0x390  worker_thread+0x106/0x250  ? bh_worker+0x110/0x110  kthread+0xb7/0xe0  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20  </TASK>|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|5.5|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.是否涉及abi变化|openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,master:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否|
|已分析|6.原因说明|openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**

src-openEuler/kernel

内容风险标识

评论 (7)

src-openEuler/kernel .gitee-modal { width: 500px !important; }

内容风险标识

CVE-2025-21970

评论 (7)

搜索帮助

src-openEuler/kernel