一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号:CVE-2025-22125
漏洞归属组件:kernel
漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值:
BaseScore:N/A None
Vector:CVSS:3.0/
漏洞简述:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:md/raid1,raid10: don t ignore IO flagsIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it s found that raid write performanceis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist sinceblk-wbt is introduced.Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, forexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priorityreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, becauseio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ( md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT )
漏洞公开时间:2025-04-16 23:16:06
漏洞创建时间:2025-04-17 00:49:08
漏洞详情参考链接:
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125
漏洞分析指导链接:
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息:
无
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flagsIf blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performanceis quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist sinceblk-wbt is introduced.Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, forexample REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priorityreverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, becauseio will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-22125 to this issue.
openEuler评分:
5.5
Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
7.master(6.6.0):不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.6.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否
原因说明:
1.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):正常修复
2.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
7.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
参考网址 | 关联pr | 状态 | 补丁链接 |
---|---|---|---|
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22125 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a0adf3d778c4a0893c6d34a9e1b0082a6f1c495 https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c |
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-22125 | |||
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2025-22125 | |||
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2025-22125 | |||
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-22125 | None | None | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e879a0d9cb086c8e52ce6c04e5bfa63825a6213c |
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2025-22125 |
说明:补丁链接仅供初步排查参考,实际可用性请人工再次确认,补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确,烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址 补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息,便于我们不断优化工具,不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1
CVE-2025-22125
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance
is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,
due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since
blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for
example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority
reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because
io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-22125 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
原因说明:
1.master(23.08.5):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
CVE-2025-22125
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance
is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,
due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since
blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for
example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority
reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because
io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-22125 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
3.9
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
原因说明:
1.master(23.08.5):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
CVE-2025-22125
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags
If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance
is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks,
due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since
blk-wbt is introduced.
Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for
example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clearing it can cause priority
reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because
io will wait instead of failing directly in underlying disks.
Fix those problems by keep IO flags from master bio.
Fises: f51d46d0e7cb ("md: add support for REQ_NOWAIT")
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-22125 to this issue.
openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响
修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否):
1.master(6.1.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否
原因说明:
1.master(23.08.5):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:正常修复
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复
登录 后才可以发表评论