CVE-2024-58093

一、漏洞信息
漏洞编号：CVE-2024-58093
漏洞归属组件：kernel
漏洞归属的版本：4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.1.8,6.4.0,6.6.0
CVSS V3.0分值：
BaseScore：N/A None
Vector：CVSS：3.0/
漏洞简述：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ( PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free ), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log]
漏洞公开时间：2025-04-16 23:15:53
漏洞创建时间：2025-04-17 00:52:35
漏洞详情参考链接：
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093

更多参考(点击展开)

参考来源	参考链接	来源链接
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5
suse_bugzilla	http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2024-58093	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241347
suse_bugzilla	https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58093	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241347
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241347
suse_bugzilla	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/security/vulns.git/plain/cve/published/2024/CVE-2024-58093.mbox	https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241347
debian		https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-58093

漏洞分析指导链接：
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
漏洞数据来源:
openBrain开源漏洞感知系统
漏洞补丁信息：

详情(点击展开)

影响的包	修复版本	修复补丁	问题引入补丁	来源
linux_kernel	6.15-rc1	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5Issue	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=456d8aa37d0f56fc9e985e812496e861dcd6f2f2	linuxkernelcves

二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log]The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-58093 to this issue.
openEuler评分：
5.5
Vector：CVSS：3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响)：
1.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响
2.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响
4.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响
7.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否

原因说明：
1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复
2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复
3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围
6.master(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
8.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在

Hi openeuler-ci-bot, welcome to the openEuler Community.
I'm the Bot here serving you. You can find the instructions on how to interact with me at Here.
If you have any questions, please contact the SIG: Kernel, and any of the maintainers.

@yangyingliang ,@jiaoff ,@guohaocs2c ,@hanjun-guo ,@woqidaideshi ,@newbeats ,@zhangyi089 ,@colyli ,@thundertown ,@htforge ,@chiqijun ,@lengchao ,@zhujianwei001 ,@kylin-mayukun ,@wangxiongfeng ,@wkfxxx ,@SuperSix173 ,@jentlestea ,@oskernel0719 ,@gasonchen 
**issue处理注意事项:** 
**1. 当前issue受影响的分支提交pr时, 须在pr描述中填写当前issue编号进行关联, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**2. 模板内容需要填写完整, 无论是受影响或者不受影响都需要填写完整内容,未引入的分支不需要填写, 否则无法关闭当前issue;**
**3. 以下为模板中需要填写完整的内容, 请复制到评论区回复, 注: 内容的标题名称(影响性分析说明, openEuler评分, 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响), 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否), 原因说明)不能省略,省略后cve-manager将无法正常解析填写内容.**
************************************************************************
影响性分析说明:

openEuler评分: (评分和向量)

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):

原因说明：
1.master(6.6.0):
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):

issue处理具体操作请参考: 
https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md
pr关联issue具体操作请参考:
https://gitee.com/help/articles/4142

参考网址	关联pr	状态	补丁链接
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58093	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5
https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-58093
https://www.opencve.io/cve/CVE-2024-58093
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2024-58093
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-58093	None	None	https://git.kernel.org/linus/cbf937dcadfd571a434f8074d057b32cd14fbea5
http://www.cnnvd.org.cn/web/vulnerability/queryLds.tag?qcvCnnvdid=CVE-2024-58093

说明：补丁链接仅供初步排查参考，实际可用性请人工再次确认，补丁下载验证可使用CVE补丁工具。
若补丁不准确，烦请在此issue下评论 '/report-patch 参考网址补丁链接1,补丁链接2' 反馈正确信息，便于我们不断优化工具，不胜感激。
如 /report-patch https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-3997 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/5b1cf7a9be37e20133c0208005274ce4a5b5c6a1

CVE-2024-58093

影响性分析说明：
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removal

Before 456d8aa37d0f ("PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal to
avoid use-after-free"), we would free the ASPM link only after the last
function on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.

That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,
link->downstream would point to free'd memory after.

After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any function
removal on the bus pertaining to a given link.

That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstream
port, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link which
still remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.

The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, because
pciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.

On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.
Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link is
obsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.

[kwilczynski: commit log]

The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-58093 to this issue.

openEuler评分:(评分和向量)
5.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响):
1.master(6.1.0):不受影响
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响

修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否)：
1.master(6.1.0):否
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:否
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否

原因说明：
1.master(23.08.5):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围
4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围
5.openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复
6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复
8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复

@CTC-XiboWang 经过 cve-manager 解析, 已分析的内容如下表所示:
| 状态  | 分析项目 | 内容 |
|:--:|:--:|---------|
|已分析|1.影响性分析说明|In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:PCI/ASPM: Fix link state exit during switch upstream function removalBefore 456d8aa37d0f (&#34;PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM on MFD function removal toavoid use-after-free&#34;), we would free the ASPM link only after the lastfunction on the bus pertaining to the given link was removed.That was too late. If function 0 is removed before sibling function,link-&gt;downstream would point to free&#39;d memory after.After above change, we freed the ASPM parent link state upon any functionremoval on the bus pertaining to a given link.That is too early. If the link is to a PCIe switch with MFD on the upstreamport, then removing functions other than 0 first would free a link whichstill remains parent_link to the remaining downstream ports.The resulting GPFs are especially frequent during hot-unplug, becausepciehp removes devices on the link bus in reverse order.On that switch, function 0 is the virtual P2P bridge to the internal bus.Free exactly when function 0 is removed -- before the parent link isobsolete, but after all subordinate links are gone.[kwilczynski: commit log]The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-58093 to this issue.|
|已分析|2.openEulerScore|5.5|
|已分析|3.openEulerVector|AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H|
|已分析|4.受影响版本排查|openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:受影响,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:受影响,master:不受影响,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响|
|已分析|5.是否涉及abi变化|master:否,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:否,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:否|
|已分析|6.原因说明|openEuler-24.03-LTS:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1:正常修复,openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2:正常修复,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不修复-超出修复范围,openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不修复-超出修复范围,master:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next:不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发,openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在|

**请确认分析内容的准确性, 确认无误后, 您可以进行后续步骤, 否则您可以继续分析.**