Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
128
Star
73
Fork
331
src-openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2025-38351
Done
#ICNFN5
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2025-07-19 21:01
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2025-38351](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector:CVSS:3.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flushIn KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercallsHVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EXallow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposedto be invalidated.However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently nofiltering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations ofINVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD s INVLPGA silently ignoresnon-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel s INVVPID explicitlysignals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition sGVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether thisruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make thatassumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms real Hyper-V interpretsthe specification in the same way.Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoidtripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out bad GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the onlydownside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing sois suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLBflushes for non-canonical addresses. 漏洞公开时间:2025-07-19 20:15:35 漏洞创建时间:2025-07-19 21:01:18 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025071951-CVE-2025-38351-75ea@gregkh/T/#u | | | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | | | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025071951-CVE-2025-38351-75ea@gregkh/T | | | | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382059 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | gregkh/linux | | https://github.com/gregkh/linux/commit/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230.patch | | ljqc | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | nvd | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flushIn KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercallsHVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EXallow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposedto be invalidated.However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently nofiltering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations ofINVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD's INVLPGA silently ignoresnon-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel's INVVPID explicitlysignals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition'sGVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether thisruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make thatassumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms "real" Hyper-V interpretsthe specification in the same way.Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoidtripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out "bad"GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the onlydownside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing sois suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLBflushes for non-canonical addresses.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-38351 to this issue. openEuler评分: 7.3 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响 4.master(6.12.33):不受影响 5.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复 4.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 6.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2122
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2025-38351](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector:CVSS:3.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flushIn KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercallsHVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EXallow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposedto be invalidated.However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently nofiltering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations ofINVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD s INVLPGA silently ignoresnon-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel s INVVPID explicitlysignals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition sGVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether thisruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make thatassumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms real Hyper-V interpretsthe specification in the same way.Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoidtripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out bad GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the onlydownside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing sois suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLBflushes for non-canonical addresses. 漏洞公开时间:2025-07-19 20:15:35 漏洞创建时间:2025-07-19 21:01:18 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025071951-CVE-2025-38351-75ea@gregkh/T/#u | | | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | | | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38351 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025071951-CVE-2025-38351-75ea@gregkh/T | | | | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382059 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | gregkh/linux | | https://github.com/gregkh/linux/commit/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230.patch | | ljqc | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d4dea3f76510c0afe3f18c910f647b816f7d566 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa787ac07b3ceb56dd88a62d1866038498e96230 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1b3ad11ec11c88ba9f79a73d27d4cda3f80fb24 | | nvd | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5784ea45663330eaa868c518ea40e7a9f06aa2d | | nvd | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flushIn KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercallsHVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EXallow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposedto be invalidated.However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently nofiltering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations ofINVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD's INVLPGA silently ignoresnon-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel's INVVPID explicitlysignals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error(): invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000 WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482 invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel] Call Trace: vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel] kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition'sGVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether thisruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make thatassumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms "real" Hyper-V interpretsthe specification in the same way.Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoidtripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out "bad"GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the onlydownside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing sois suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLBflushes for non-canonical addresses.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-38351 to this issue. openEuler评分: 7.3 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):受影响 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):受影响 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):受影响 4.master(6.12.33):不受影响 5.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 6.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):正常修复 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):正常修复 3.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):正常修复 4.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 6.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4:不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 三、漏洞修复 安全公告链接:https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/safety-bulletin/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2025-2122
Comments (
8
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
CTC-Xibo.Wang
CTC-XiboWang
Assignee
Collaborator
+Assign
+Mention
Labels
CVE/FIXED
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Milestones
No related milestones
No related milestones
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(2)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register