Sign in
Sign up
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Search
Help
Terms of use
About Us
Explore
Enterprise
Education
Gitee Premium
Gitee AI
AI teammates
Sign in
Sign up
Fetch the repository succeeded.
description of repo status
Open Source
>
Other
>
Operation System
&&
Donate
Please sign in before you donate.
Cancel
Sign in
Scan WeChat QR to Pay
Cancel
Complete
Prompt
Switch to Alipay.
OK
Cancel
Watch
Unwatch
Watching
Releases Only
Ignoring
128
Star
73
Fork
329
src-openEuler
/
kernel
Closed
Code
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
Insights
Pipelines
Service
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
Quality Analysis
Jenkins for Gitee
Tencent CloudBase
Tencent Cloud Serverless
悬镜安全
Aliyun SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
DevLens
Don’t show this again
Update failed. Please try again later!
Remove this flag
Content Risk Flag
This task is identified by
as the content contains sensitive information such as code security bugs, privacy leaks, etc., so it is only accessible to contributors of this repository.
CVE-2025-39791
Done
#ICXMD7
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
owner
Opened this issue
2025-09-12 02:09
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2025-39791](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector:CVSS:3.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:dm: dm-crypt: Do not partially accept write BIOs with zoned targetsRead and write operations issued to a dm-crypt target may be splitaccording to the dm-crypt internal limits defined by the max_read_sizeand max_write_size module parameters (default is 128 KB). The intent isto improve processing time of large BIOs by splitting them into smalleroperations that can be parallelized on different CPUs.For zoned dm-crypt targets, this BIO splitting is still done but withoutthe parallel execution to ensure that the issuing order of writeoperations to the underlying devices remains sequential. However, thesplitting itself causes other problems:1) Since dm-crypt relies on the block layer zone write plugging to handle zone append emulation using regular write operations, the reminder of a split write BIO will always be plugged into the target zone write plugged. Once the on-going write BIO finishes, this reminder BIO is unplugged and issued from the zone write plug work. If this reminder BIO itself needs to be split, the reminder will be re-issued and plugged again, but that causes a call to a blk_queue_enter(), which may block if a queue freeze operation was initiated. This results in a deadlock as DM submission still holds BIOs that the queue freeze side is waiting for.2) dm-crypt relies on the emulation done by the block layer using regular write operations for processing zone append operations. This still requires to properly return the written sector as the BIO sector of the original BIO. However, this can be done correctly only and only if there is a single clone BIO used for processing the original zone append operation issued by the user. If the size of a zone append operation is larger than dm-crypt max_write_size, then the orginal BIO will be split and processed as a chain of regular write operations. Such chaining result in an incorrect written sector being returned to the zone append issuer using the original BIO sector. This in turn results in file system data corruptions using xfs or btrfs.Fix this by modifying get_max_request_size() to always return the sizeof the BIO to avoid it being split with dm_accpet_partial_bio() incrypt_map(). get_max_request_size() is renamed toget_max_request_sectors() to clarify the unit of the value returnedand its interface is changed to take a struct dm_target pointer and apointer to the struct bio being processed. In addition to this change,to ensure that crypt_alloc_buffer() works correctly, set the dm-cryptdevice max_hw_sectors limit to be at mostBIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT (1 MB with a 4KB page architecture).This forces DM core to split write BIOs before passing them tocrypt_map(), and thus guaranteeing that dm-crypt can always accept anentire write BIO without needing to split it.This change does not have any effect on the read path of dm-crypt. Readoperations can still be split and the BIO fragments processed inparallel. There is also no impact on the performance of the write pathgiven that all zone write BIOs were already processed inline instead ofin parallel.This change also does not affect in any way regular dm-crypt blockdevices. 漏洞公开时间:2025-09-12 01:15:45 漏洞创建时间:2025-09-12 02:09:57 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025091153-CVE-2025-39791-0f3d@gregkh/T/#u | | | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025091153-CVE-2025-39791-0f3d@gregkh/T | | | | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394613 | | | | https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | snyk | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | snyk | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | snyk | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: Reserved. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2025-39791](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.0分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector:CVSS:3.0/ 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:dm: dm-crypt: Do not partially accept write BIOs with zoned targetsRead and write operations issued to a dm-crypt target may be splitaccording to the dm-crypt internal limits defined by the max_read_sizeand max_write_size module parameters (default is 128 KB). The intent isto improve processing time of large BIOs by splitting them into smalleroperations that can be parallelized on different CPUs.For zoned dm-crypt targets, this BIO splitting is still done but withoutthe parallel execution to ensure that the issuing order of writeoperations to the underlying devices remains sequential. However, thesplitting itself causes other problems:1) Since dm-crypt relies on the block layer zone write plugging to handle zone append emulation using regular write operations, the reminder of a split write BIO will always be plugged into the target zone write plugged. Once the on-going write BIO finishes, this reminder BIO is unplugged and issued from the zone write plug work. If this reminder BIO itself needs to be split, the reminder will be re-issued and plugged again, but that causes a call to a blk_queue_enter(), which may block if a queue freeze operation was initiated. This results in a deadlock as DM submission still holds BIOs that the queue freeze side is waiting for.2) dm-crypt relies on the emulation done by the block layer using regular write operations for processing zone append operations. This still requires to properly return the written sector as the BIO sector of the original BIO. However, this can be done correctly only and only if there is a single clone BIO used for processing the original zone append operation issued by the user. If the size of a zone append operation is larger than dm-crypt max_write_size, then the orginal BIO will be split and processed as a chain of regular write operations. Such chaining result in an incorrect written sector being returned to the zone append issuer using the original BIO sector. This in turn results in file system data corruptions using xfs or btrfs.Fix this by modifying get_max_request_size() to always return the sizeof the BIO to avoid it being split with dm_accpet_partial_bio() incrypt_map(). get_max_request_size() is renamed toget_max_request_sectors() to clarify the unit of the value returnedand its interface is changed to take a struct dm_target pointer and apointer to the struct bio being processed. In addition to this change,to ensure that crypt_alloc_buffer() works correctly, set the dm-cryptdevice max_hw_sectors limit to be at mostBIO_MAX_VECS << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT (1 MB with a 4KB page architecture).This forces DM core to split write BIOs before passing them tocrypt_map(), and thus guaranteeing that dm-crypt can always accept anentire write BIO without needing to split it.This change does not have any effect on the read path of dm-crypt. Readoperations can still be split and the BIO fragments processed inparallel. There is also no impact on the performance of the write pathgiven that all zone write BIOs were already processed inline instead ofin parallel.This change also does not affect in any way regular dm-crypt blockdevices. 漏洞公开时间:2025-09-12 01:15:45 漏洞创建时间:2025-09-12 02:09:57 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> | 参考来源 | 参考链接 | 来源链接 | | ------- | -------- | -------- | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025091153-CVE-2025-39791-0f3d@gregkh/T/#u | | | | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025091153-CVE-2025-39791-0f3d@gregkh/T | | | | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394613 | | | | https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | | | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2025-39791 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | cvelistv5 | | | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | osv | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | circl | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a2c4c60470352acf9cde7a2dfa661c1e67e796 | | snyk | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8864616719b6bbf92356bc89ff544b0cd484c656 | | snyk | | | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e549663849e5bb3b985dc2d293069f0d9747ae72 | | snyk | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: Reserved. openEuler评分: 5.5 Vector:CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 2.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 3.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 5.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在
Comments (
5
)
Sign in
to comment
Status
Done
Backlog
已挂起
Doing
Done
Declined
Assignees
Not set
CTC-Xibo.Wang
CTC-XiboWang
Assignee
Collaborator
+Assign
+Mention
Labels
CVE/UNAFFECTED
sig/Kernel
Not set
Projects
Unprojected
Unprojected
Milestones
No related milestones
No related milestones
Pull Requests
None yet
None yet
Successfully merging a pull request will close this issue.
Branches
No related branch
Branches (
-
)
Tags (
-
)
Planed to start   -   Planed to end
-
Top level
Not Top
Top Level: High
Top Level: Medium
Top Level: Low
Priority
Not specified
Serious
Main
Secondary
Unimportant
Duration
(hours)
参与者(2)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
Going to Help Center
Search
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
Comment
Repository Report
Back to the top
Login prompt
This operation requires login to the code cloud account. Please log in before operating.
Go to login
No account. Register