登录
注册
开源
企业版
高校版
搜索
帮助中心
使用条款
关于我们
开源
企业版
高校版
私有云
模力方舟
AI 队友
登录
注册
轻量养虾,开箱即用!低 Token + 稳定算力,Gitee & 模力方舟联合出品的 PocketClaw 正式开售!点击了解详情
代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
仓库状态说明
开源项目
>
其他开源
>
操作系统
&&
捐赠
捐赠前请先登录
取消
前往登录
扫描微信二维码支付
取消
支付完成
支付提示
将跳转至支付宝完成支付
确定
取消
Watch
不关注
关注所有动态
仅关注版本发行动态
关注但不提醒动态
128
Star
73
Fork
329
src-openEuler
/
kernel
关闭
代码
Issues
1197
Pull Requests
35
Wiki
统计
流水线
服务
JavaDoc
PHPDoc
质量分析
Jenkins for Gitee
腾讯云托管
腾讯云 Serverless
悬镜安全
阿里云 SAE
Codeblitz
SBOM
开发画像分析
我知道了,不再自动展开
更新失败,请稍后重试!
移除标识
内容风险标识
本任务被
标识为内容中包含有代码安全 Bug 、隐私泄露等敏感信息,仓库外成员不可访问
CVE-2023-53382
已完成
#ICYQJB
CVE和安全问题
openeuler-ci-bot
拥有者
创建于
2025-09-18 22:41
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2023-53382](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53382) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.x分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector: 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. Itcan be reproduced by:- smc_run nginx- smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ? __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK>During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will beassigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignmenterrors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registrationfailure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. Butthe resources assigned to the connection won t be reset.When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process willbe executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2,it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link insmcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points tocorrect SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 linkmistakenly.Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the relatedMR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr: create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. vThis patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigninglink. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean theresources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation orregistration. 漏洞公开时间:2025-09-18 22:15:41 漏洞创建时间:2025-09-18 22:41:27 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53382 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> 无 </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | gregkh/linux | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9540765d1882d15497d880096de99fafabcfa08c | | ljqc | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. Itcan be reproduced by:- smc_run nginx- smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ? __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK>During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will beassigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignmenterrors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registrationfailure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. Butthe resources assigned to the connection won t be reset.When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process willbe executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2,it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link insmcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points tocorrect SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 linkmistakenly.Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the relatedMR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr:assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link:assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr:create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link:keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. vThis patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigninglink. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean theresources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation orregistration.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2023-53382 to this issue. openEuler评分: 5.3 Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
一、漏洞信息 漏洞编号:[CVE-2023-53382](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53382) 漏洞归属组件:[kernel](https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel) 漏洞归属的版本:4.19.140,4.19.194,4.19.90,5.10.0,6.1.19,6.4.0,6.6.0 CVSS V3.x分值: BaseScore:N/A None Vector: 漏洞简述: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. Itcan be reproduced by:- smc_run nginx- smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ? __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK>During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will beassigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignmenterrors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registrationfailure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. Butthe resources assigned to the connection won t be reset.When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process willbe executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2,it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link insmcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points tocorrect SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 linkmistakenly.Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the relatedMR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr: create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. vThis patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigninglink. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean theresources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation orregistration. 漏洞公开时间:2025-09-18 22:15:41 漏洞创建时间:2025-09-18 22:41:27 漏洞详情参考链接: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53382 <details> <summary>更多参考(点击展开)</summary> 无 </details> 漏洞分析指导链接: https://gitee.com/openeuler/cve-manager/blob/master/cve-vulner-manager/doc/md/manual.md 漏洞数据来源: 七彩瞬析开源风险感知平台 漏洞补丁信息: <details> <summary>详情(点击展开)</summary> | 影响的包 | 修复版本 | 修复补丁 | 问题引入补丁 | 来源 | | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | gregkh/linux | | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9540765d1882d15497d880096de99fafabcfa08c | | ljqc | </details> 二、漏洞分析结构反馈 影响性分析说明: In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. Itcan be reproduced by:- smc_run nginx- smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ? __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 </TASK>During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will beassigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignmenterrors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registrationfailure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. Butthe resources assigned to the connection won t be reset.When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process willbe executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2,it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link insmcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points tocorrect SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 linkmistakenly.Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx]will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the relatedMR may not have been initialized, so crash happens. | Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr:assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link:assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr:create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link:keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. vThis patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigninglink. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean theresources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation orregistration.The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2023-53382 to this issue. openEuler评分: 5.3 Vector:CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H 受影响版本排查(受影响/不受影响): 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):受影响 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):受影响 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响 修复是否涉及abi变化(是/否): 1.master(6.12.33):否 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):否 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):否 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):否 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):否 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):否 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):否 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):否 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):否 原因说明: 1.master(6.12.33):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 2.openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4(4.19.90):不受影响-漏洞代码不存在 3.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围 4.openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4(5.10.0):不修复-超出修复范围 5.openEuler-24.03-LTS(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 6.openEuler-24.03-LTS-Next(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 7.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 8.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP2(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发 9.openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3(6.6.0):不受影响-漏洞代码不能被攻击者触发
评论 (
5
)
登录
后才可以发表评论
状态
已完成
待办的
已挂起
进行中
已完成
已拒绝
负责人
未设置
CTC-Xibo.Wang
CTC-XiboWang
负责人
协作者
+负责人
+协作者
标签
CVE/FIXED
sig/Kernel
未设置
项目
未立项任务
未立项任务
里程碑
未关联里程碑
未关联里程碑
Pull Requests
未关联
未关联
关联的 Pull Requests 被合并后可能会关闭此 issue
分支
未关联
分支 (
-
)
标签 (
-
)
开始日期   -   截止日期
-
置顶选项
不置顶
置顶等级:高
置顶等级:中
置顶等级:低
优先级
不指定
严重
主要
次要
不重要
预计工期
(小时)
参与者(2)
1
https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel.git
git@gitee.com:src-openeuler/kernel.git
src-openeuler
kernel
kernel
点此查找更多帮助
搜索帮助
Git 命令在线学习
如何在 Gitee 导入 GitHub 仓库
Git 仓库基础操作
企业版和社区版功能对比
SSH 公钥设置
如何处理代码冲突
仓库体积过大,如何减小?
如何找回被删除的仓库数据
Gitee 产品配额说明
GitHub仓库快速导入Gitee及同步更新
什么是 Release(发行版)
将 PHP 项目自动发布到 packagist.org
评论
仓库举报
回到顶部
登录提示
该操作需登录 Gitee 帐号,请先登录后再操作。
立即登录
没有帐号,去注册