Shared configuration for a Hyperledger Fabric blockchain network is stored in a collection configuration transactions, one per channel. Each configuration transaction is usually referred to by the shorter name configtx.
Channel configuration has the following important properties:
Configuration is stored as a transaction of type HeaderType_CONFIG
in a block with no other transactions. These blocks are referred to as
Configuration Blocks, the first of which is referred to as the
Genesis Block.
The proto structures for configuration are stored in
fabric/protos/common/configtx.proto. The Envelope of type
HeaderType_CONFIG encodes a ConfigEnvelope message as the
Payload data field. The proto for ConfigEnvelope is defined
as follows:
message ConfigEnvelope {
Config config = 1;
Envelope last_update = 2;
}
The last_update field is defined below in the Updates to
configuration section, but is only necessary when validating the
configuration, not reading it. Instead, the currently committed
configuration is stored in the config field, containing a Config
message.
message Config {
uint64 sequence = 1;
ConfigGroup channel_group = 2;
}
The sequence number is incremented by one for each committed
configuration. The channel_group field is the root group which
contains the configuration. The ConfigGroup structure is recursively
defined, and builds a tree of groups, each of which contains values and
policies. It is defined as follows:
message ConfigGroup {
uint64 version = 1;
map<string,ConfigGroup> groups = 2;
map<string,ConfigValue> values = 3;
map<string,ConfigPolicy> policies = 4;
string mod_policy = 5;
}
Because ConfigGroup is a recursive structure, it has hierarchical
arrangement. The following example is expressed for clarity in golang
notation.
// Assume the following groups are defined var root, child1, child2, grandChild1, grandChild2, grandChild3 *ConfigGroup // Set the following values root.Groups["child1"] = child1 root.Groups["child2"] = child2 child1.Groups["grandChild1"] = grandChild1 child2.Groups["grandChild2"] = grandChild2 child2.Groups["grandChild3"] = grandChild3 // The resulting config structure of groups looks like: // root: // child1: // grandChild1 // child2: // grandChild2 // grandChild3
Each group defines a level in the config hierarchy, and each group has an associated set of values (indexed by string key) and policies (also indexed by string key).
Values are defined by:
message ConfigValue {
uint64 version = 1;
bytes value = 2;
string mod_policy = 3;
}
Policies are defined by:
message ConfigPolicy {
uint64 version = 1;
Policy policy = 2;
string mod_policy = 3;
}
Note that Values, Policies, and Groups all have a version and a
mod_policy. The version of an element is incremented each time
that element is modified. The mod_policy is used to govern the
required signatures to modify that element. For Groups, modification is
adding or removing elements to the Values, Policies, or Groups maps (or
changing the mod_policy). For Values and Policies, modification is
changing the Value and Policy fields respectively (or changing the
mod_policy). Each element's mod_policy is evaluated in the
context of the current level of the config. Consider the following
example mod policies defined at Channel.Groups["Application"] (Here,
we use the golang map reference syntax, so
Channel.Groups["Application"].Policies["policy1"] refers to the base
Channel group's Application group's Policies map's
policy1 policy.)
policy1 maps to Channel.Groups["Application"].Policies["policy1"]
Org1/policy2 maps to
Channel.Groups["Application"].Groups["Org1"].Policies["policy2"]
/Channel/policy3 maps to Channel.Policies["policy3"]
Note that if a mod_policy references a policy which does not exist,
the item cannot be modified.
Configuration updates are submitted as an Envelope message of type
HeaderType_CONFIG_UPDATE. The Payload data of the
transaction is a marshaled ConfigUpdateEnvelope. The ConfigUpdateEnvelope
is defined as follows:
message ConfigUpdateEnvelope {
bytes config_update = 1;
repeated ConfigSignature signatures = 2;
}
The signatures field contains the set of signatures which authorizes
the config update. Its message definition is:
message ConfigSignature {
bytes signature_header = 1;
bytes signature = 2;
}
The signature_header is as defined for standard transactions, while
the signature is over the concatenation of the signature_header
bytes and the config_update bytes from the ConfigUpdateEnvelope
message.
The ConfigUpdateEnvelope config_update bytes are a marshaled
ConfigUpdate message which is defined as follows:
message ConfigUpdate {
string channel_id = 1;
ConfigGroup read_set = 2;
ConfigGroup write_set = 3;
}
The channel_id is the channel ID the update is bound for, this is
necessary to scope the signatures which support this reconfiguration.
The read_set specifies a subset of the existing configuration,
specified sparsely where only the version field is set and no other
fields must be populated. The particular ConfigValue value or
ConfigPolicy policy fields should never be set in the
read_set. The ConfigGroup may have a subset of its map fields
populated, so as to reference an element deeper in the config tree. For
instance, to include the Application group in the read_set, its
parent (the Channel group) must also be included in the read set,
but, the Channel group does not need to populate all of the keys,
such as the Orderer group key, or any of the values or
policies keys.
The write_set specifies the pieces of configuration which are
modified. Because of the hierarchical nature of the configuration, a
write to an element deep in the hierarchy must contain the higher level
elements in its write_set as well. However, for any element in the
write_set which is also specified in the read_set at the same
version, the element should be specified sparsely, just as in the
read_set.
For example, given the configuration:
Channel: (version 0)
Orderer (version 0)
Appplication (version 3)
Org1 (version 2)
To submit a configuration update which modifies Org1, the
read_set would be:
Channel: (version 0)
Application: (version 3)
and the write_set would be
Channel: (version 0)
Application: (version 3)
Org1 (version 3)
When the CONFIG_UPDATE is received, the orderer computes the
resulting CONFIG by doing the following:
channel_id and read_set. All elements in the
read_set must exist at the given versions.write_set which do not appear at the same version in the
read_set.ConfigUpdateEnvelope satisfies the mod_policy for each
element in the update set.ConfigEnvelope which includes the
CONFIG_UPDATE as the last_update field and the new config
encoded in the config field, along with the incremented
sequence value.ConfigEnvelope into a Envelope of type
CONFIG, and ultimately writes this as the sole transaction in a
new configuration block.When the peer (or any other receiver for Deliver) receives this
configuration block, it should verify that the config was appropriately
validated by applying the last_update message to the current config
and verifying that the orderer-computed config field contains the
correct new configuration.
Any valid configuration is a subset of the following configuration. Here
we use the notation peer.<MSG> to define a ConfigValue whose
value field is a marshaled proto message of name <MSG> defined
in fabric/protos/peer/configuration.proto. The notations
common.<MSG>, msp.<MSG>, and orderer.<MSG> correspond
similarly, but with their messages defined in
fabric/protos/common/configuration.proto,
fabric/protos/msp/mspconfig.proto, and
fabric/protos/orderer/configuration.proto respectively.
Note, that the keys {{org_name}} and {{consortium_name}}
represent arbitrary names, and indicate an element which may be repeated
with different names.
&ConfigGroup{
Groups: map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
"Application":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
"AnchorPeers":peer.AnchorPeers,
},
},
},
},
"Orderer":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
},
},
},
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue> {
"ConsensusType":orderer.ConsensusType,
"BatchSize":orderer.BatchSize,
"BatchTimeout":orderer.BatchTimeout,
"KafkaBrokers":orderer.KafkaBrokers,
},
},
"Consortiums":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{consortium_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
},
},
},
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue> {
"ChannelCreationPolicy":common.Policy,
}
},
},
},
},
Values: map<string, *ConfigValue> {
"HashingAlgorithm":common.HashingAlgorithm,
"BlockHashingDataStructure":common.BlockDataHashingStructure,
"Consortium":common.Consortium,
"OrdererAddresses":common.OrdererAddresses,
},
}
The ordering system channel needs to define ordering parameters, and consortiums for creating channels. There must be exactly one ordering system channel for an ordering service, and it is the first channel to be created (or more accurately bootstrapped). It is recommended never to define an Application section inside of the ordering system channel genesis configuration, but may be done for testing. Note that any member with read access to the ordering system channel may see all channel creations, so this channel's access should be restricted.
The ordering parameters are defined as the following subset of config:
&ConfigGroup{
Groups: map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
"Orderer":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
},
},
},
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue> {
"ConsensusType":orderer.ConsensusType,
"BatchSize":orderer.BatchSize,
"BatchTimeout":orderer.BatchTimeout,
"KafkaBrokers":orderer.KafkaBrokers,
},
},
},
Each organization participating in ordering has a group element under
the Orderer group. This group defines a single parameter MSP
which contains the cryptographic identity information for that
organization. The Values of the Orderer group determine how the
ordering nodes function. They exist per channel, so
orderer.BatchTimeout for instance may be specified differently on
one channel than another.
At startup, the orderer is faced with a filesystem which contains information for many channels. The orderer identifies the system channel by identifying the channel with the consortiums group defined. The consortiums group has the following structure.
&ConfigGroup{
Groups: map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
"Consortiums":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{consortium_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
},
},
},
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue> {
"ChannelCreationPolicy":common.Policy,
}
},
},
},
},
},
Note that each consortium defines a set of members, just like the
organizational members for the ordering orgs. Each consortium also
defines a ChannelCreationPolicy. This is a policy which is applied
to authorize channel creation requests. Typically, this value will be
set to an ImplicitMetaPolicy requiring that the new members of the
channel sign to authorize the channel creation. More details about
channel creation follow later in this document.
Application configuration is for channels which are designed for application type transactions. It is defined as follows:
&ConfigGroup{
Groups: map<string, *ConfigGroup> {
"Application":&ConfigGroup{
Groups:map<String, *ConfigGroup> {
{{org_name}}:&ConfigGroup{
Values:map<string, *ConfigValue>{
"MSP":msp.MSPConfig,
"AnchorPeers":peer.AnchorPeers,
},
},
},
},
},
}
Just like with the Orderer section, each organization is encoded as
a group. However, instead of only encoding the MSP identity
information, each org additionally encodes a list of AnchorPeers.
This list allows the peers of different organizations to contact each
other for peer gossip networking.
The application channel encodes a copy of the orderer orgs and consensus
options to allow for deterministic updating of these parameters, so the
same Orderer section from the orderer system channel configuration
is included. However from an application perspective this may be largely
ignored.
When the orderer receives a CONFIG_UPDATE for a channel which does
not exist, the orderer assumes that this must be a channel creation
request and performs the following.
Consortium value of the top level group.Application group are a subset of the organizations included in
the corresponding consortium and that the ApplicationGroup is set
to version 1.Orderer group from the ordering system channel, and creating an
Application group with the newly specified members and specifying
its mod_policy to be the ChannelCreationPolicy as specified
in the consortium config. Note that the policy is evaluated in the
context of the new configuration, so a policy requiring ALL
members, would require signatures from all the new channel members,
not all the members of the consortium.CONFIG_UPDATE as an update to this
template configuration. Because the CONFIG_UPDATE applies
modifications to the Application group (its version is
1), the config code validates these updates against the
ChannelCreationPolicy. If the channel creation contains any other
modifications, such as to an individual org's anchor peers, the
corresponding mod policy for the element will be invoked.CONFIG transaction with the new channel config is wrapped
and sent for ordering on the ordering system channel. After ordering,
the channel is created.此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。