这是riscv的速度(gdb输出):
Start address 0x0800015c, load size 31438
Transfer rate: 3 KB/sec, 849 bytes/write.
相较之下使用swd的f103可以达到8 KB/sec。是SOC的flash慢,还是JTAG的速度慢?差了近三倍,挺影响体验的。
Hi,
I am working on my own fork, and I do see other results. I did not change the JTAG interface handling (yet) and is based on GPIO. I reach the following speeds:
Loading section .init, size 0x236 lma 0x8000000
Loading section .text, size 0x3522 lma 0x8000240
Loading section .sdata2._global_impure_ptr, size 0x4 lma 0x8003764
Loading section .data, size 0x70 lma 0x8003768
Start address 0x800015c, load size 14284
Transfer rate: 12 KB/sec, 840 bytes/write.
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。
nice!
@Micha Hoiting Where did you optimize compared with this resp?
Hi,
Here is my fork https://gitee.com/michahoiting/rv-link for my own project.
You can try it out, but I did not do any thing on optimization.
Maybe I can help to find out why your speed is only 3KB/sec?
I tested it again, it's totally ok now. Thank you!
登录 后才可以发表评论