代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
package com.fishercoder.solutions;
/**
* 81. Search in Rotated Sorted Array II
*
* Suppose an array sorted in ascending order is rotated at some pivot unknown to you beforehand.
*
* (i.e., [0,0,1,2,2,5,6] might become [2,5,6,0,0,1,2]).
*
* You are given a target value to search. If found in the array return true, otherwise return false.
*
* Example 1:
*
* Input: nums = [2,5,6,0,0,1,2], target = 0
* Output: true
* Example 2:
*
* Input: nums = [2,5,6,0,0,1,2], target = 3
* Output: false
* Follow up:
*
* This is a follow up problem to Search in Rotated Sorted Array, where nums may contain duplicates.
* Would this affect the run-time complexity? How and why?
*/
public class _81 {
public static class Solution1 {
public boolean search(int[] nums, int target) {
int start = 0;
int end = nums.length - 1;
//check each num so we will check start == end
//We always get a sorted part and a half part
//we can check sorted part to decide where to go next
while (start <= end) {
int mid = start + (end - start) / 2;
if (nums[mid] == target) {
return true;
}
//if left part is sorted
if (nums[start] < nums[mid]) {
if (target < nums[start] || target > nums[mid]) {
//target is in rotated part
start = mid + 1;
} else {
end = mid - 1;
}
} else if (nums[start] > nums[mid]) {
//right part is rotated
//target is in rotated part
if (target < nums[mid] || target > nums[end]) {
end = mid - 1;
} else {
start = mid + 1;
}
} else {
//duplicates, we know nums[mid] != target, so nums[start] != target
//based on current information, we can only move left pointer to skip one cell
//thus in the worst case, we would have target: 2, and array like 11111111, then
//the running time would be O(n)
start++;
}
}
return false;
}
}
}
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。