代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
From 6bac834c5a44e6f72e0c7087e8b57b006beef816 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Malte Skarupke <malteskarupke@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 05:57:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] nptl: Use a single loop in pthread_cond_wait instaed of
a nested loop
[BZ #25847]
The loop was a little more complicated than necessary. There was only one
break statement out of the inner loop, and the outer loop was nearly empty.
So just remove the outer loop, moving its code to the one break statement in
the inner loop. This allows us to replace all gotos with break statements.
(cherry picked from commit 929a4764ac90382616b6a21f099192b2475da674)
Signed-off-by: Sunil Dora <sunilkumar.dora@windriver.com>
Tested-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
---
nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c b/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
index 4773859524..b7f1d9c41d 100644
--- a/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
+++ b/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
@@ -382,17 +382,15 @@ __pthread_cond_wait_common (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
return err;
}
- /* Now wait until a signal is available in our group or it is closed.
- Acquire MO so that if we observe (signals == lowseq) after group
- switching in __condvar_quiesce_and_switch_g1, we synchronize with that
- store and will see the prior update of __g1_start done while switching
- groups too. */
- unsigned int signals = atomic_load_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g);
-
- do
- {
+
while (1)
{
+ /* Now wait until a signal is available in our group or it is closed.
+ Acquire MO so that if we observe (signals == lowseq) after group
+ switching in __condvar_quiesce_and_switch_g1, we synchronize with that
+ store and will see the prior update of __g1_start done while switching
+ groups too. */
+ unsigned int signals = atomic_load_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g);
uint64_t g1_start = __condvar_load_g1_start_relaxed (cond);
unsigned int lowseq = (g1_start & 1) == g ? signals : g1_start & ~1U;
@@ -401,7 +399,7 @@ __pthread_cond_wait_common (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
/* If the group is closed already,
then this waiter originally had enough extra signals to
consume, up until the time its group was closed. */
- goto done;
+ break;
}
/* If there is an available signal, don't block.
@@ -410,7 +408,16 @@ __pthread_cond_wait_common (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
G2, but in either case we're allowed to consume the available
signal and should not block anymore. */
if ((int)(signals - lowseq) >= 2)
- break;
+ {
+ /* Try to grab a signal. See above for MO. (if we do another loop
+ iteration we need to see the correct value of g1_start) */
+ if (atomic_compare_exchange_weak_acquire (
+ cond->__data.__g_signals + g,
+ &signals, signals - 2))
+ break;
+ else
+ continue;
+ }
// Now block.
struct _pthread_cleanup_buffer buffer;
@@ -431,19 +438,9 @@ __pthread_cond_wait_common (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
/* If we timed out, we effectively cancel waiting. */
__condvar_cancel_waiting (cond, seq, g, private);
result = err;
- goto done;
+ break;
}
-
- /* Reload signals. See above for MO. */
- signals = atomic_load_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g);
}
- }
- /* Try to grab a signal. See above for MO. (if we do another loop
- iteration we need to see the correct value of g1_start) */
- while (!atomic_compare_exchange_weak_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g,
- &signals, signals - 2));
-
- done:
/* Confirm that we have been woken. We do that before acquiring the mutex
to allow for execution of pthread_cond_destroy while having acquired the
--
2.27.0
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。